The Charter and Proclamation of the Rights of Man - Page 11 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Any other minor ideologies.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15194517
The Resister wrote:I've offered no definition of the word slavery.

Because you want to play it deuces wild:
Taxing a man's labor, however, IS a form of slavery.

See? Slavery is a legal and/or societal institution that enables certain people forcibly to compel certain other people to labor for the former's benefit on a more or less permanent basis. So taxing people's labor may be legalized robbery, but it is not slavery, as no one is thereby forcibly compelled to labor for another's benefit.
#15194521
Rich wrote:the picture you posted was of Adolph Hitler, not the American Nazi party

George Lincoln Rockwell idolized Adolf Hitler. His American Nazi Party was a National Socialist party advocating Nazi doctrines.

William Dudley Pelley, leader of the Silver Legion of America - The Silver Shirts - differing only in his faux religious justification for a Final Solution, saw himself saving America as Hitler and his Brown Shirts saved Germany.


:)
#15194569
@Drlee ;

I agree also with @annatar1914 that some of this may blow up in their faces. Many of my enthusiastic far right friends are mellowing. Trump's participation in the Virginia is seemingly harming the Republican candidate.


All one has to do is visualize his ego, the response to winning of himself and his followers, were he to win election in 2024 AD. I have spent years now telling people about the threat of the near Anarchy that persons like the OP want to reign over America. Well, that's the secret, of the OP and pretty much Trump as well; they don't want to govern and administer, nor anyone else, they want to break down and destroy, so they can have what they regard as their ideological construct of ''Liberty''.
#15201003
Truth To Power wrote:TL;DR First, run that puppy through a grammar checker. Jefferson you ain't.


If you didn't read it, you can't speak to the grammar therein. What stupidity! Nobody's trying to be Jefferson. Multiple people worked on the document. If it isn't worth reading, it isn't worth you commenting on unless you're just trying to be a smart ass. And that ain't necessary. Rights going to Hell and we need grammar nazis.
#15201116
The Resister wrote:If you didn't read it, you can't speak to the grammar therein.

I started reading it, and the grammar was so twisted, I knew it would be too much trouble trying to figure out what it meant.
What stupidity!

How true...
Nobody's trying to be Jefferson.

Or clear....
Multiple people worked on the document.

Were any of them native English speakers?
If it isn't worth reading, it isn't worth you commenting on unless you're just trying to be a smart ass.

Some people here might not know why your document is so hard for them to understand. I thought it would be considerate to let them know it wasn't necessarily their fault.
And that ain't necessary. Rights going to Hell and we need grammar nazis.

We need clarity, which your proclamation lacks. People not being clear even about what rights are (e.g., your charter) could be a major reason they are going to hell.
  • 1
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11

Drlee wrote: @Pants-of-dog And for the […]

@Rancid Yes they do. I don't know why anybody […]

Lol Qatz ended up at Alex Jones talking points pu[…]

Why not? On policy, your differences are wafer-[…]