XogGyux wrote:This is ridiculous. So you think if you are in the bed with a woman, since you are both naked she is then free to insert her fingers in your a hole, put a strap on and ride you?
She can try and initiate it, but she should have to stop if the man says "No".
If the woman does something really fast and harsh before the man has a chance to communicate "No", then that could get into a grey zone. But I think we are getting into a different discussion here since that is the type of thing the man will know is happening immediately during or before the fact, whereas "stealthing" is something the woman may not realize is happening while it is happening.
Rugoz wrote:The only potential problem here is enforceability.
The issue here is that the woman's testimony is almost always going to be automatically believed. The law is going to give the green light for that to happen, because how else could this law realistically ever get enforced?
The problem with these sort of laws is that men will go to prison for "regret sex". Where women regret that they had sex after the fact, and then decide the man should be blamed and held responsible for it.
It's unrealistic for a man to always ask a woman if she verbally consents to every specific sex act while he is having sex with her.
Sometimes it is clear that the woman DOES know, but she can just claim she didn't, or wasn't sure.
In the Julian Assange case, one of the women actually told the police she realized he wasn't wearing a condom a few seconds after he went into her, but she still allowed the intercourse to continue. It didn't matter, under the wording of the law, the man was still guilty, and they could use that as a basis to get him extradited from another country.
That wasn't the real reason the woman had complained to police - she was actually angry about the man carrying on a relationship with another woman at the same time - but that was used as a pretext to go after him.
Some women have claimed rape since a man didn't call them back after a casual one-time encounter. So you can just imagine how open to abuse this law would be.