One things for sure they don't oppose abortion, because they care about human life. No please, don't even try to foist that nonsense on us.
No discrimination against the UV
Recognise Pluto's planetary status
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo North America Mods
The people too poor to travel out of state to get an abortion should just pack up their life and move elsewhere. Good thinking, guys.
Not often I agree with Rugoz, but he is right when he says people can get the services out of state. The problem is, we are looking at it from what we have now and not what we can offer in the future. We haven't had a ruling as of yet and it maybe Roe vs Wade remains. But if it doesn't, I don't see why the Democrats and charities can't offer a service for these poor women in order to compensate their losses and a free shuttle service to get them out of state to have an abortion. There are solutions if Biden really does have an opinion on this and isn't just playing politics.
late wrote:If Roe is killed, any state could kill such a service.
Sure. Or they could keep it. And all the government needs to do is provide transport to bypass this problem. Or is free movement also being debated by the SCOTUS?
late wrote:A person helping someone break the law is usually liable...
Roe, aptly named, was the decision that a human fetus was worth nothing more than a fish egg, though most likely some fish eggs are protected by some environmental laws. If embryos and fetuses have no value, should we protect fertility clinics from any liability for mistakes they make?
Godstud wrote:@Unthinking Majority Being pro-choice is not baby hating. I see you are indeed living up to your name in the "unthinking" part.
USA is likely going to step back 50 years and become a theocracy. Have fun, idiots!
USA USA USA!
Godstud wrote:Well said, @Rich.
The very people who are anti-abortion are the same people trying to get rid of the very social programs that might stop a pregnant woman from getting an abortion.
Canada has no abortion law. Canada allows women to decide how to control their own body. The women can make the tough choices, with their doctor.
Pretending that abortion is used as a form of birth control is taking the rare exception and pretending it's the norm.
If you pro-birthers(not pro-life) really cared about stopping abortions, you'd FUND Planned parenthood and social programs that would help women make the decision keep the baby. You'd pay for the Foster care homes and adoption centres.
Yeah it's one of those issues if the state and politics just stayed the <cuss term> out on the whole it would run better for everyone involved.
ckaihatsu wrote:I don't think it would be that easy -- doesn't the public have a standing collective interest in *some* degree of administration -- meaning *regulation*, of course. We have standards for weights and measures, etc.
I don't think it would be that easy -- doesn't the public have a standing collective interest in *some* degree of administration -- meaning *regulation*, of course. We have standards for weights and measures, etc.
It's really hard to understand US grand strategy […]
linguistic revolution Competing with Bernie […]
I was taking a "consumer protection" […]
Cuba is not comparable by no means to Ukraine, tho[…]