Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo North America Mods
Fasces wrote:You're asking me if I think people have a right to stalk and harass other people in public while carrying a deadly weapon?
No, they don't.
Puffer Fish wrote:The fact that the three were not arrested by authorities until over 2 months after the incident indicates that this was not initially seen by police as an obvious murder.
Puffer Fish wrote:Let's not use loaded words or get into a semantics argument.
Is "stalk and harass" pretty much equivalent for you to "follow and pursue", yes or no?
Did these men have a legal right to be able to follow and try to keep an eye on a suspect's location until police could arrive, if there would have been a justifiable reason for police to stop the suspect?
Here's something else to consider: Travis claims to have seen someone who matched the profile of Arbery before in the construction site, but Travis did not approach because Travis was unarmed at the time and he says the suspect reached for their waist as if the suspect might have a gun. Travis called this incident in to the police, 11 days before the chase and shooting incident.
Wulfschilde wrote:The guy who took the cell phone video doesn't deserve life in prison, he gave it to his lawyer thinking it would exonerate him because he didn't do anything but they nailed him as an accomplice because of anti-racist hysteria. The other two deserve something since all he did was enter a construction site without permission.
Pants-of-dog wrote:The existence of the video shows that the defendant had knowledge of the crime and did not report it to the authorities, effectively making the defendant an accomplice to the crime.
Perhaps... there are things you can do to mitigat[…]
In 2014, on February 14. Abe started again the &q[…]
The 9.5 million count is deceptive, since it inclu[…]
That might be ok and even good for a short period[…]