Pants-of-dog wrote:So you deliberately chose the hottest year prior to the current era
What do you mean by "the current era"?
in order to make it seem like the current temperatures are normal,
They are indisputably normal for the current interglacial period known as the Holocene.
but instead we can see that they compare to the highest temperatures in 500 years.
<sigh> That is a period for most of which temperatures were abnormally low because solar activity was at a multi-millennium low -- as I have proved to you multiple times because you always ask for evidence of facts that I have already proved, and when I supply the evidence, you contrive some pretext to misinterpret and dismiss it and repeat your false claim that I never provide evidence. Just as you did in the post to which this post is a response. It's always the same.
And in the 21st century, solar activity has markedly (that means significantly) decreased while temperatures increased.
I've already proved to you multiple times that that is fallacious reasoning because you falsely assume that the earth's temperature reaches equilibrium immediately. If the temperature in your house is 18C, then the house will
continue to get warmer if you turn the thermostat
down from 23C to 21C. A kettle of 80C water on the stove will continue to get warmer if you turn the element
DOWN from "High" to "Medium."
GET IT???Even Solanki, whom you have previously cited, does not think solar activity is responsible for global warming.
<sigh> No, that claim is also false, as I have also proved to you multiple times. He only said it could not be the
principal cause of the rapid warming in
the last three decades of the 20th century, which we know was caused by the up-phase of the internal 60-year oceanic cycle. As I have proved to you multiple times, and for which you always then ask for evidence again, which I provide and you then contrive some pretext to misinterpret and dismiss, and claim I haven't provided evidence for. It's always the same.