- 20 May 2022 09:34
#15228421
Yes. that's right. When she leaves him.
Please explain to us why arresting him is needed.
Depending on what type of coercion, the husband could be separately prosecuted for that.
You can view the physical force or threats as a crime, not the sex. If there is criminal coercion (and there is sufficient evidence for that, which is another topic), he can be arrested.
She agreed to have sex with him. She agreed to marry him.
It's definitely not the end of the world if it happens ONE time. She can leave him after that. She doesn't have to put up with him ever again if she isn't willing to.
That is a straw man. The argument is not because women are property.
Godstud wrote:He won't rape her anymore.
Yes. that's right. When she leaves him.
Please explain to us why arresting him is needed.
Godstud wrote: No. reality doesn't work that way. There are factors like coercion and other things that factor in,
Depending on what type of coercion, the husband could be separately prosecuted for that.
You can view the physical force or threats as a crime, not the sex. If there is criminal coercion (and there is sufficient evidence for that, which is another topic), he can be arrested.
Godstud wrote: It's not that simple, moron, and ONCE is too many times for a rape.
She agreed to have sex with him. She agreed to marry him.
It's definitely not the end of the world if it happens ONE time. She can leave him after that. She doesn't have to put up with him ever again if she isn't willing to.
Godstud wrote:Yes, an asshole fool misogynist who thinks women are property WOULD think like that.
That is a straw man. The argument is not because women are property.