Beren wrote:Ukraine's more integrated with NATO and Poland than before, so I wonder if they can be really satisfied with that, the next time they'll have to fight a lot more NATO-ised and armed Ukraine, as well as some Polish troops perhaps. Due to the failed regime change attempt now it's vital for Russia to secure its southern flank, especially Crimea and the whole Azov region, militarily.
Well, I think they can. NATO and USA were deeply involved in steering crap in Ukraine. It's obvious by weapons, by instructors, by Maydan, by Zelensky, by AZOV, c14, right sector...all that is more or less destroyed and pushed back to the west. Russian population in the east is safe and secured and without some big escalation of war the rough times of Kiev terror is behind them.
These parts in the east will be self-sustainable and self-defensible soon.
So, the story of Russian soft belly through Ukraine is about to end.
XogGyux wrote:
Dude you are fucking insane. In 3 months, the US alone has approved 50billions, WITH A B. Of those, about ~40 billion for military aid... from the US alone. In addition, In addition, there is a huge European coalition that probably will match a very large portion of this payment. All of this to say, that on the first half of this year, Ukraine will have access to more defense capital than what even russia spends. That does not even count the free intel which surely costs millions of not billions (satellites, radars, spy planes, etc).
Ah, yeah...US money and aid is change maker. For instance a trillion USD "invested" in Afghanistan, really made a smooth change.
Now Talibans have better weapons than Ukraine.
You are genius. I hope Kadyrov will have chance to measure your IQ
However, "a quick breakdown of the $40 billion reveals $8.7 billion will go to replenish the US weapons stockpile (thus not going to Ukraine at all); $3.9 billion for USEUCOM (the ‘office’ that dictates military tactics to Kiev); $5 billion for a fuzzy, unspecified “global food supply chain”; $6 billion for actual weapons and “training” to Ukraine; $9 billion in “economic assistance” (which will disappear into selected pockets); and $0.9 billion for refugees."
Good old Americans help more themselves than victims of their politics.
XogGyux wrote:Who is on Russia's side? Belarus? Azerbaijan? Russia stand alone, the puppet governments barely tip the balance. There is no way out of this without admitting defeat or starting WWIII.
On the Russian side it's not the west (12%) only the rest (88%). You are just programmed by the Russophobic matrix not to use your brain.
NATO imperialism keep receiving punches.
You blew it in Afghanistan, in Syria, in Kazakhstan your attempt of colorized unrest was erased in instant by Putin, and then you pull Zelensky move
.
Now, deranged Biden is apologizing to brother Xi for his (Biden's) stupid statements about Taivan.
Drlee wrote:Well Skippy. They kinda' fucked that up now didn't they? If Russia gets any further from its "goals" it will be trying to join NATO itself.
Zippy, spare us your traditional pile of incoherent nonsenses.
"The Aggressor is the one who attacks before the USA does", Milos Zeman, the Czech President