Yes, the SCOTUS can overturn state law on abortion.
This is how you guys ended up with this removal of rights.
I guess you are just stuck on stupid. You talk about lies and then keep telling this one.
The SCOTUS did not remove a single right from anyone. WOMEN can still have abortions in every state. They must direct their law makers to ensure that they can. The SCOTUS did not and will not stop them. If there is any removal of a privilege (for except in one state there is no right to an abortion) it is the state that is doing it, not the SCOTUS.
And yes, I did read the opinion. I am still waiting for you to address the lie Alito told on page 61.
Nonsense. Just another one of your diversions.
You think the rights or pregnant people are irrelevant. Got it.
I think you are angry and lashing out at me. I think your use of the term "pregnant people" is a childish slam on women. I think you know that I have done nothing on this thread but educate women and those men who support the privilege on how to overturn laws they see as draconian. You are disingenuous or careless when you try to denigrate me as if I was the problem. I believe in a woman's right to have an abortion within limits.
That does not change the fact that the SCOTUS just took away rights by overturning a precedent.
No they didn't. The states did that. The court was moot on a woman's right to an abortion.
Not according to the science.
Studies show that abortion occurs just as frequently where it is banned compared to where it is fully legal.
Not really. You should learn to read the studies. And not in the US. But again.
Right, You want these sluts to learn some responsibility, so this threat could be used to control their sexual behaviour. Got it.
You are irrationally angry. It is not like you to degrade women. I am sorry you feel that people who have unprotected sex when they do not want to have children are "sluts". I don't. I think it is pretty stupid to have unprotected sex when one does not want to have a child but that is not a moral judgment.
Then why do they provide no support for babies? They do not sacrifice or make any effort to save babies, Unless it is a side effect of controlling female sexual behaviour.
Off topic. Please start a thread about welfare and universal health care. Then we can have a robust discussion about this topic.
I will go off topic with you to point out that there is very substantial support for woman's prenatal health in many places. In my own state, which bans abortion in almost every case, we have free healthcare for the poor and direct money payments to raise children which is not dependent on any kind of "moral clause". In the US there is a child tax credit and there are direct federal payments to people below a certain income who have a child. And there is foster care for the child of a woman who does not wish to keep her child. While I would agree that so much more should be done it is untrue for you to use the word "nothing".
No, all these red states have a very high maternal mortality rate as well as a distressing lack of medical care and support for new babies and parents.
See the above. And please stay on topic.