Looks like the First Amendment is under assault as much as the Second - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#15236487
BlutoSays wrote:It was not a coup attempt. Try again without your DNC talking points.

Why are you democrats attacking free speech and free thought?

Trump tried numerous times to overturn a democratic election. He pressured states to find extra votes for him and reject voting results. He ordered his VP to reject the will of the electoral college, which is unconstitutional. What would you call it?

He lied to you and you drank it up like a fool. Use your brain.
#15236497
Unthinking Majority wrote:Trump tried numerous times to overturn a democratic election. He pressured states to find extra votes for him and reject voting results. He ordered his VP to reject the will of the electoral college, which is unconstitutional. What would you call it?

He lied to you and you drank it up like a fool. Use your brain.


No, he didn't. Furthermore, it was NOT a democratic election. Election laws were changed by those who had no legitimate power to change those laws and there were actions initiated circumventing of monitoring of elections and counting to "stuff ballot boxes" both physically and electronically. Unsolicited ballots were mailed out against election law and mass ballot harvesting in certain precincts was instituted to steal the election.

FURTHERMORE, are you telling us that since you believe he did try to overturn an election (which he didn't), that those unproven accusations justify ignoring the constitutional rights of private citizens by this administration, DOJ/FBI, Homeland Security and also actions to abrogate free speech and attack political enemies after the election using government AND Democratic National Committee resources?
#15236499
Biden & Company jerking off the press and it doesn't appear to be going well. Hooda thunk it. :lol:

Image

Image
“The administration’s continued efforts to limit access to the president cannot be defended. Any notion that space is ‘limited’ is not supported by the fact that every other president before Biden (including Trump) allowed full access to the very same spaces without making us fill out a request form prior to admittance,”


The White House press corps has finally discovered this may not be the most transparent administration ever

#15236500
BlutoSays wrote:No, he didn't. Furthermore, it was NOT a democratic election. Election laws were changed by those who had no legitimate power to change those laws and there were actions initiated circumventing of monitoring of elections and counting to "stuff ballot boxes" both physically and electronically. Unsolicited ballots were mailed out against election law and mass ballot harvesting in certain precincts was instituted to steal the election.

FURTHERMORE, are you telling us that since you believe he did try to overturn an election (which he didn't), that those unproven accusations justify ignoring the constitutional rights of private citizens by this administration, DOJ/FBI, Homeland Security and also actions to abrogate free speech and attack political enemies after the election using government AND Democratic National Committee resources?


Delusional false claims that have all been refuted. When the republicans went to court they were humiliated and sent back for reeducation about the basic rules of evidence.

Holding people accountable for actual crimes is not infringement of their rights.

The Election was democratic.
#15236505
BlutoSays wrote:No, he didn't. Furthermore, it was NOT a democratic election. Election laws were changed by those who had no legitimate power to change those laws and there were actions initiated circumventing of monitoring of elections and counting to "stuff ballot boxes" both physically and electronically. Unsolicited ballots were mailed out against election law and mass ballot harvesting in certain precincts was instituted to steal the election.

Trump is recorded on video, audio, and/or his own tweets doing all the things I said.

He took his case to the conservative-controlled SCOTUS which included some of his hand-picked nominees and they rejected his legal challenges: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN2AM1S1

State courts also rejected his legal challenges.

What do you do when you're a sore loser who doesn't want to concede defeat and you have hundreds of millions of campaign donations left over to spend after an election that you don't want to just donate to the GOP or fellow GOP candidates? You spend it on a gazillion bogus legal challenges in a hail-mary because you have nothing else to lose. He lost every single case alleging voter fraud and/or which sought to overturn results.

FURTHERMORE, are you telling us that since you believe he did try to overturn an election (which he didn't), that those unproven accusations justify ignoring the constitutional rights of private citizens by this administration, DOJ/FBI, Homeland Security and also actions to abrogate free speech and attack political enemies after the election using government AND Democratic National Committee resources?

I'm not going to take Tucker Carlson's word for it. I believe in free speech but I'd have to investigate these cases myself and frankly i'm too lazy.

You have to be in a hierarchical structure right?[…]

Thread stinks of Nazi Bandera desperation, trying[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

This is an interesting concept that China, Russia[…]

We have totally dominant hate filled ideology. T[…]