Krugman on Putin - Page 3 - Politics | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

User avatar
By Beren
QatzelOk wrote:That's just it. We are Romanized, but were also First Nation-ized.

So you're not lamenting at least as to whether what the Romans have done for you. :lol:
User avatar
By Mike12
Beren wrote:You can thank Rome for your whole lifestyle actually, but I'm sure you'd live in a pre-Roman Celtic village rather than today's Montreal as if Romanisation has never happened. :roll:

We can thank Rome for our lifestyle?

bring (something, especially a region or people) under Roman influence or authority:
"though not himself a Roman, he was fully Romanized, spoke Latin, and lived in a Roman-style villa"
make Roman Catholic in character:
"he has Romanized the services of his church"
put (text) into the Roman alphabet or into roman type:

I usually see the 3rd one. The Roman alphabet with variation is widespread.

Scotland was at odds with Rome. Its famously walled off by Hadrian's Wall. Live there or don't live there, people tend to know other civilizing influences.
The Latins were around for the start of christianity to leave literal Latin Churches in their provinces. Theres the matter of the literal Latin Church at the end of the West Roman Empire.
It did crumble didn't it? There are no working aqueducts, colosseums later on, just the church. I'd be lost to say what Rome would mean to most people otherwise.

Christianity was a major unifying factor between Eastern and Western Europe before the Arab conquests, but the conquest of North Africa sundered maritime connections between those areas. Increasingly, the Byzantine Church differed in language, practices, and liturgy from the Western Church. The Eastern Church used Greek instead of the Western Latin. Theological and political differences emerged, and by the early and middle 8th century issues such as iconoclasm, clerical marriage, and state control of the Church had widened to the extent that the cultural and religious differences were greater than the similarities.[97] The formal break, known as the East–West Schism, came in 1054, when the papacy and the patriarchy of Constantinople clashed over papal supremacy and excommunicated each other, which led to the division of Christianity into two Churches—the Western branch became the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern branch the Eastern Orthodox Church.[98]

How ridiculous is two Churches in the first place? Now how confusing is the rest of the discussion in the Church(s).

Christianity as an organization, consider the King of Israel was accused of standing against the Emperor. If Jesus Christ were King of Israel after the older line of King David and the Israelites then that's too much for the Roman Governors that are decided in Rome for the provinces like Pontius Pilate the Roman Governor for Jerusalem. Feudalism and Kings of Europe develop as an association of Kings.
Jesus Christ was a basis of law and all learning. I saw a U.S. Grant quote about not promoting any Sectarian schools.

The greatest innovations come from the desertion of Greek Constantinople called a Renaissance means "Rebirth" possibly "renewed" with the Turkish Muslim capture Greeks travel around, perhaps Presbyters.

Several posts here are falsely claiming the Roman Emperor's pet idea of having a Church everyone believes in, while most people know about the christian slaves in Rome, the rumors against Christians the persecutions, the burning of Rome by Nero blamed on Christians, and the acceptance of those worshippers being 300/400.
User avatar
By QatzelOk
Mike12 wrote:Christianity was a major unifying factor between Eastern and Western Europe before the Arab conquests,

Yes, the Catholic church got 10% of everyone's income, and 15% of all the land (in perpetuity).

This BANK was a unifying factor that really inspired the Holy Oligarchs who benefitted from taxation without representation. Of course, this BANK used propaganda (their holy texts) to create a dumb worldview that would be very profitable for the BANK of Christ.
User avatar
By QatzelOk
Rancid wrote:I would trust a bank more than @QatzelOk.

Yes, and your family are probably Roman Catholic descendant.

"Trust us! We killed Jesus." - Bank of Rome (pointy hats sold separately)
User avatar
By Rancid
QatzelOk wrote:Yes, and your family are probably Roman Catholic descendant.

"Trust us! We killed Jesus." - Bank of Rome (pointy hats sold separately)

I support the murder of Jesus. Yes.
User avatar
By Potemkin
Rancid wrote:I support the murder of Jesus. Yes.

If Putin got his hands on those documents, it woul[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Those dumb lies have been debunked a million time[…]

Yeah, that's wrong. They should have hired Al-Qae[…]