Well I knew that the call to tell us how the government was abusing you personally would not work.
Let me correct you. I know you would not want to lie.
You belong to a democrat party that believes in allowing felons to vote and allowing younger and younger people to vote.
Wrong. I belong to the Republican Party.. And I do not believe felons should ever vote. Or own guns.
You say no to voter ID, but meanwhile, the 26th amendment states " The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age." How the hell do you verify age without ID? The fact is, you don't give two-shits about the Constitution.
I did not say "no voter ID". The constitution does not require ID. Indeed at the time it was written, ID was almost unheard of. They could not have wanted it.
Let's test that and allow anyone to purchase a firearm without ID and background check because they're good people and there's no need to verify any buyer! No? You don't want that? Why not?
Different thing. Nice try at 5th grade false equivalency but it won't work here.
Speaking of gubmint intrusion: demanding vaccinations of some, but letting postal workers out of the requirements because you're afraid of losing union support. Meanwhile, you're only to happy about Biden kicking out those in the military about to retire and rejecting vaccinations, because you know it brings down the pension numbers for military retirees, but allows you to reward those military members who knuckle under and agree to your demands.
The word is "government". If you had a literate friend check your work he/she would have corrected you. Perhaps you should try to find a literate friend.
I am a retired military person. It will really not do for a stay-at-home patriot like yourself to talk about that. Suffice it to say that soldiers a) obey their orders and b) do not take actions that will endanger their fellow soldiers or threaten the combat readiness of the military. We, soldiers, have been forced to be vaccinated since before WWI. It is not until Trump told you to complain that any did. As for people processed out for disobeying orders? That is on them.
You democrats are now demanding to know about transactions larger than $600 because you want to "get the rich" as if that's going to stop any of the rich.
I am not a democrat.
Your real impetus is putting more surveillance on the citizenry for your taxation demands in the future. You leftists pushed to hire 87,000 new IRS agents to harass the citizenry while working overtime to defund the police.
Imagine that. I believe people should pay their taxes according to the law. As for this absurd $600.00. You do not understand what you are saying but I will not attempt to correct you other than to say that the law requiring reporting of income has been on the book for generations. And trust me as someone with a pretty good net worth. You are not going to fight tax fraud $600.00 at a time.
You whine about guns used in violence, and completely ignore violence in the inner-shitties, while demanding cashless bail and more prosecutors that allow violent offenders to go free.
Do try to stay on subject. Putting the kitchen sink in one sentence is confusing. I guess this is something you heard on Fox News. The word by the way is "inner cities". This, for you, a racist, is code for black and Latino people not a geographic designation. I will just let your racism speak for itself.
You weaponize the DOJ/FBI to go after political enemies just like you did decades ago using the IRS to attack political enemies with conservative leanings.
I agree that my political party has a rich history of weaponizing government institutions to thwart its political enemies. Of course you should recall that I am a Republican.
Lois Lerner even refused to testify about it after she made her opening statement to congress...bottom line, you democrats are guilty as fuck of abusing the citizenry based on their political leanings.
I am a Republican. And unlike you a conservative. That is a social libertarian and fiscal conservative.
You know what, Drlee... you are a disgusting leftist individual and an apologist for democrats, plain and simple.
You are deluded. Or, just perhaps, not intelligent enough to know what you are writing.
The democrat party today is to the left of Lenin today;
There is no "democrat party". There is a Democratic Party. Perhaps you should take a political science class. (Google "things that happened in 1828".
they're in favor of collectivism and against the individual to the core.
No they are not. They are not my party and I am not defending their beliefs.
I don't expect you to realize that; you're too stupid and have conveniently forgotten too much of the past.
Well I certainly remember a lot more of it than you do son.
Stop whining about gerrymandering.
No. I will not.
You leftist DEMOCRATS are front and center in practicing gerrymandering every chance you get.
Do not be so shallow. Get an adult to read my posts to you. I am against gerrymandering. I believe it should be illegal. I know it is unconstitutional but such a political hot-potato that no SCOTUS will touch it.
We're not in iron-fisted communism just yet, but you're working overtime to instantiate it.
Remember that Political Science class I recommended for you? In it you will learn what "communism" is.
Democrat party center-right today my ass:
Classy.
The US has never seen a communist for either major party as a candidate for President.
It is hard to debate someone who is so far into the shallow end of the pool.
Never wrestle with a pig. You will just get dirty and the pig likes it.