Elon Musk may be planning hostile takeover of Twitter - declines board seat with majority share - Page 12 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#15257719
Morgan Le Fey wrote:I don't how big you are nor whether you punch women or not, I would love to punch you if you are indeed the Nazi you appear to be by using this horshit Nazi muddying the waters fakery.

:) So would you like to punch Kanye West?
#15257747
Morgan Le Fey wrote:It shows. You don't get me at all.



We're both, and I don't care what anyone else thinks or feels about us, they're wrong or lying. We destroy property, not people. Violence against material things is not violence but glorious destruction. Keep in mind, I'm not a kid either. Not even close. Punching Nazis in the face is the only acceptable initiation of force. For the record, we NEVER call liberals Nazis in order to punch them. We just generally walk away from liberals shaking our heads. Only the actual right-wing-dangerous racist/homophobic/misogynistic whatevers earn those punches. I haven't really hit a guy myself yet, not even sure if it would hurt, but that isn't the point, abolition is.

We see hard societal hierarchies be they religious, state, corporation, or military as the trick the bourgeoisie play on the masses in order to maintain their wealth and control. As such continuous opposition to all these things is a duty. Why do you think you need a leader to tell you what to do? We don't lick boot leather. Ever. Anarchism is a simple philosophy like Islam is a simple religion: follow a few strict principles and let the rest fuck itself.



Yep. Its kind of weird to me how quickly right-wing forces move to take control of the media. I like how Elon, on advice from Andy Ngo of all people, banned the Crimethink collective, yet Proud Boys, The Base, Oath Keepers, and III%ers all have a presence on the platform.

So Elon, like the rest can fuck himself. He can do it twice for being such a "Dr. Evil" nerd about everything too.



He's shit because he's right wing. Beyond that, why worship another dewd? He's just "some guy" no smarter, no dumber than anyone but ruthlessly self-interested and connected enough to influence all our lives for his profit.

I get if you're the type who just need the world to exist as it is that this is too complicated a dive for you to buy into, but again I don't care about converting anyone... like at all. I expect to convert 0 boot lickers to "my" cause.

Why do you think Elon knows better than you just because he's a leader?



No, he's literally just a snake oil salesman who had good fortune at the time of his birth and has the power and wealth to carry out his personal agenda. A right-wing weird "Outer Space Resources" kind of vision where he pretends he's neutral but isn't and never was.




Um, is he your dad or something honey? He sucks at his job, and like all pretenders has reached his Peter Principle. Twitter is self-destructing, Teslas are a mess, His solar panel systems are fuckery, and the list goes on and on. He's almost another Donald Trump, just Dutch or whatever.



He tried to get "hard" with his Twitter employees and all the senior staff blew him off and took the severance deal. Tesla is a literal mess. He was born to a modern "Noble" family and was able to Capitalize on his connections and early wealth to put him in the position he is in today... Like all of these guys.

I mean you have to understand the Communists by now. We're like them but no vanguards and we just start with the destroyed state, we don't need to wait on any withering.

Still in most instances, when it comes to neoliberal politics we will agree. Pro-Gun, Pro-labor, We stress the fight against racist nation-states more than Communists do as "Everyone is functionally equal" is one of our primary tenets.

I hope all these lovely words make my words make sense. I really don't debate dishonest folks for very long. ;)


I do understand you but it doesn't mean that i accept that. Totally separate things all together. I might accept punching the Nazis part but I definitely do not accept your glorious destruction and disregard for hierarchy part.

It feels sort of that there is a crazy idea going on that leaders should be perfect and without flaw and allgood which is a crazy idea in itself. Leaders are also with all the bad and the good things that comes from being a human. On the topic it is Musk right now. Is he perfect? Fuck no, he acts like a retard majority of the time. He does a fair share of shit decision also. But having said that, he is also a very good if not a perfect CEO at work irrelevant of how much shit he gets as of recently.

At the end of the day, the CEOs job is like of a musician who writes music. Let me call him Mozart.(Yes, it is an overexaggeration) CEO writes the music but he is not supposed to play it, you have the whole orchestra from conductor to specialists in playing different instruments who are split up in teams who are supposed to do it. And Musk is exceptionally well at being that writer.

1) In Tesla he continued the electric vehicle push of different sort while finding the money to actually turn ideas in to a product.
2) In Specex he continued pushing the idea of renewables rockets and "travel to Mars" while also finding the money to realise it and finish a product.
3) Same thing goes for Starlink.

I can't really comment on PayPal much because I just don't know. But the general trend is visible that at its core, his CEO job, he pushes an idea(music) and actually finds the money and people to realise it. At the core of it all, this is a CEOs job. It is not his job to manage people in the whole company, it is not his job to know the technology or specifics of every architectural detail or engineering solution and so on. So now we are in the Elons Twitter phase.

Elons Twitter phase is actually stalling because he can't really formulate as of yet what is his idea of Twitter actually. If previously in Tesla or Specex or with Starlink and probably Paypal there were clear ideas, visions then for Twitter it is undecided as of yet. The firing of people or rehiring them or discussing tech in twitter or "hardcore" work ethic is irrelevant because it is not a vision for the product or company and probably not the things that he should be focusing as a CEO unless he sorts out the vision problem. Not a CEOs main job to that in the first place also.

Now, I understand that you will say Musk is a cuck and shit because of the Twitter and its trendy while you will forget the previous successes. Or more importantly say that previous successes are irrelevant since he is a right winger of some sort which brings nothing positive but that is just a dishonest take on things. Any person who realises a product to life from an idea improves out lives for the better. Well at least 99% of those implementations with some exceptions.
#15257774
JohnRawls wrote:I might accept punching the Nazis part

Oh might you? Did you learn nothing from the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union. The Bolsheviks took power under the cover of fighting the far undemocratic right. The October coup took place thorough the Military Revolutionary Committee an organisation with a supposedly defencist mandate. The Bolsheviks were somewhat politically paralysied by the convocation of the Constituent Assembly. At that stage they were not the fully developed extreme fascist terror machine that they would later become. As the Bolsheviks had called for its convocation it was politically difficult for them to shut it down. That is why it was Anarchists that closed down the Constituent Assembly, a serious alternative centre of legitimacy and therefore power to the Bolsheviks and consigned Russia to seventy years of totalitarian terror.

Notice I said anarchists, because Anatoli Zhelezniakov wasn't acting alone but as commander and leader of a detachment of militia. Its amazing how many people fall for the old Anarchist nonsense that they don't have leaders. No it was because he was a leader of armed aggressors that Anatoli Zhelezniakov, this elitist, was able to make this decision over the heads of a hundred million people.

Also I would like to know where people stand on this issue, is it OK to go up and punch Kanye West in the face?
#15257825
For the record, Right wingers crested the term "cuck" and I don't use it. I could care less about str8 relationships and who's banging who's wife for whom.

Really the salaciousness of the word renders it unspeakable to those who don't feel appearing so callous has more bearing on your own character than who you think you're dunking on.

Good luck with the boot locking John Rawls. Leaders don't know better than you.
#15257827
Also I would like to know where people stand on this issue, is it OK to go up and punch Kanye West in the face?

Yes, as a Nazi and open antisemite it's a duty. As I've noted above.

It's funny you think that's controversial. I'd also punch Dave Chappelle who we know is a super chicken shit.

Again tho, I'm just going to crushed by them, lol... but what I do I care Rich? I can take a punch or two. And my point will be made.

If it takes a girl to stand up to Nazis the men have utterly failed.
#15257832
Morgan Le Fey wrote:Also I would like to know where people stand on this issue, is it OK to go up and punch Kanye West in the face?

Yes, as a Nazi and open antisemite it's a duty. As I've noted above.

It's funny you think that's controversial. I'd also punch Dave Chappelle who we know is a super chicken shit.

Again tho, I'm just going to crushed by them, lol... but what I do I care Rich? I can take a punch or two. And my point will be made.

If it takes a girl to stand up to Nazis the men have utterly failed.


Kanye isn’t a a nazi. Everyone seems to forget, Hitler would be the first to push Kanye into a hot oven.

BUT, I can see the incitement argument. Kanye wants to be vilified to the point where it’s so bad, young people turn on his persecutors. He said it, plain as day.
#15257833
Well Bluto, I did get whacked in a feud with Kirsty Ally, so I have no doubt Twittet became a club of haves and have not.

I'm not young Ness. I'll bet I'm old enough to be your parent. Please waste your time speaking down to your children, not your elders.
#15257838
Morgan Le Fey wrote:Well Bluto, I did get whacked in a feud with Kirsty Ally, so I have no doubt Twittet became a club of haves and have not.

I'm not young Ness. I'll bet I'm old enough to be your parent. Please waste your time speaking down to your children, not your elders.


Um, okay :?:
#15257845
He's just an opportunistic doofus doing the "get a rise out of the libs for the lulz" but he needs a punch for being a general asshole regardless of all else. I mean, really?

How does this chump even make the news? Gross.

ness wrote:young people turn on his persecutors.


yet later said:

ness wrote:Ok? with a silly face


Stay honest sweetie.
#15257850
What have I said that you find contradictory? I don’t think Kanye is genuinely anti semitic. What he is engaging in will ultimately turn him into a martyr.

I’m not trying to be controversial lol. Kanye’s ‘plan’ is really obvious :lol:
#15257851
Rich wrote:Oh might you? Did you learn nothing from the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union. The Bolsheviks took power under the cover of fighting the far undemocratic right. The October coup took place thorough the Military Revolutionary Committee an organisation with a supposedly defencist mandate. The Bolsheviks were somewhat politically paralysied by the convocation of the Constituent Assembly. At that stage they were not the fully developed extreme fascist terror machine that they would later become. As the Bolsheviks had called for its convocation it was politically difficult for them to shut it down. That is why it was Anarchists that closed down the Constituent Assembly, a serious alternative centre of legitimacy and therefore power to the Bolsheviks and consigned Russia to seventy years of totalitarian terror.

Notice I said anarchists, because Anatoli Zhelezniakov wasn't acting alone but as commander and leader of a detachment of militia. Its amazing how many people fall for the old Anarchist nonsense that they don't have leaders. No it was because he was a leader of armed aggressors that Anatoli Zhelezniakov, this elitist, was able to make this decision over the heads of a hundred million people.

Also I would like to know where people stand on this issue, is it OK to go up and punch Kanye West in the face?


Yes it is. You need immediate and decisive pushback against extremists so it is fine to punch Nazis along with Communists. Perfectly legit and a self-defence action.

The anarchist here might be going over the top with the total challange of hierarchy and leadership but there NEEDS to be a pushback on some level.

You need to make sure that something like the Third Wave experiment will never be successful but on the other hand not all are in to that so they are acceptable and should continue their work. Communists and Nazis fall under the Third Wave experiment enthusiasts in my book. Perfectly legit to be pushed back and punched in the face. It is not agression, it is self-defence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third ... experiment)
#15257853
I can’t really think of an instance where I’d punch a commie in the face.

“We must have racial purity” doesn’t really have the same aggravating factor as “You deserve universal healthcare and to have an ownership stake in your job.”

One ideology is about forcing a certain aesthetic on its populace while the other actually cares about the underlying economic realities we exist in.
#15257886
SpecialOlympian wrote:I can’t really think of an instance where I’d punch a commie in the face.

“We must have racial purity” doesn’t really have the same aggravating factor as “You deserve universal healthcare and to have an ownership stake in your job.”

One ideology is about forcing a certain aesthetic on its populace while the other actually cares about the underlying economic realities we exist in.


Just means that you haven't really met any commies in your life. What about confiscating money and property from people who has an income larger than 150k per year(US context for you) and sending them to re-education camps? What about forcing propaganda down the throat to create the perfect communist identity while crushing all the other identities? What about dismembering of democracy and replacement it with one party rule? What about replacing capital ownership of enterprises with collectivised ownership?

I know that those are hard concepts for you to understand but they do exist if you ever met real communists.
  • 1
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 19
The Police Murder of Tyre Nichols

Why wouldn't the scenarios be comparable? Are yo[…]

Puerto Rico and the island colonies of the U.S. a[…]

Exit Brexit, Part Deux

For the British it's hard to see and treat even t[…]

There should be military retaliation against Chin[…]