- 20 Jun 2023 20:24
#15277568
this what many moscow loving said in 80s about Baltics , Ukraine etc. and out of 15 states the only one which bacame "barbaric AND dangerous" -MOSCOW empire.
land locked by Moscow empire ,
much like Mongolia (which does just fine) ? so why Buriatia , Tyva (occupied only in 1944) , Ural Republic, Sakha (is not landlocked ) etc. can´t follow the Mongol State lead?
map from 1918
a good read
https://inkstickmedia.com/dismantling-r ... at-a-time/
JohnRawls wrote:Decolonisation as you put it is unlikely besides may be Dagestan or Chechnya. The reason for that is simple, those parts of Russia that are currently in Russia get far more even now compared to what they would be out of Russia. Even if they gain independence they are still land locked by Russia with well no other partner around.
So the dessolution of Russia is a pipe dream that needs things to get like starvation WW3 level bad to happen. Plus nobody really in the world is interested in it, be it US or EU or China who have an inherent "need" for Russia to be whole but not barbaric or dangerous .
this what many moscow loving said in 80s about Baltics , Ukraine etc. and out of 15 states the only one which bacame "barbaric AND dangerous" -MOSCOW empire.
land locked by Moscow empire ,
much like Mongolia (which does just fine) ? so why Buriatia , Tyva (occupied only in 1944) , Ural Republic, Sakha (is not landlocked ) etc. can´t follow the Mongol State lead?
map from 1918
a good read
https://inkstickmedia.com/dismantling-r ... at-a-time/