QatzelOk wrote:I would say that Identity Politics is one of the games of the ruling class.
It is. But some dork thought my opposition to it is the same as the ruling class's promotion of it. And since he got it wrong but scored a spectacular own-goal, he wants to pretend he didn't basically admit he's on the same side of what the ruling class promote.
Rather than identify with the generalized oppression of a system built out of economic exploitation, the Ruling Class tries to sell dick-chopping technology to teenagers by telling them "it's about accepting who you really are" (for a few years).
Exactly. And understanding the inevitable conflict their ideology would create since a lot of us normal people are generally opposed to medical experiments, eugenics and dick-chopping, particularly when it happens to kids who don't have the understanding of such irreversible life-changing decisions. And on top of that, Big Pharma is making billions off all of this, but Big Pharma is the friend of the so-called left today.
It's garbage, but luckily dick-chopping "liberation" narratives are easy to see through... unless your IQ has been lowered too much by lead in gasoline.
Indeed. Much brainwashing and institutional capture has convinced people to believe and virtue-signal for an idea that people can identify out of their sex and getting sterilised and mutilated before your brain has even fully developed is...good, actually.
ingliz wrote:@Fasces quotes a government agency saying it's nearer 30 in the for-profit US.
As I pointed out, the study is eight years old. Since then, this ideology ran on steroids and reached its peak in popularity which has allowed mastectomies on young girls as young as age 13 in some states.
And if we don't even go into the genital mutilation but consider the sterilisation aspect, I'm pretty sure you read the study of how minors are being all but banned from going on the experiment because of the many concerns medical experts in this field have had. Here is a list from Denmark, who joined Britain, Norway, Sweden, New Zealand and some U.S. states on why they banned these drugs:
1. Medication/ethical uncertainties of providing children with life-altering interventions in the context of very limited understanding
2. Growing rates of detransition and lack of research into that
3. Profound uncertainty about long-term outcomes
4. Insufficient evidence
5. Growing evidence of harm
6. The high rate of psychiatric comorbidities
7. Social influence
8. A more cautious approach until more evidence of beneficial effects is available
9. Irreversible changes which reduce fertility of which the degree of reversibility remains unknown
10. Contraindications to hormones: abuse, suicidal ideation/self-harm, severe psychological distress and worrisome somatic conditions (eg cancer, thromboembolic disease).”
11. Growing reports of regretSource
What are you whining about?
What are you whining about? Why is this the only topic you talk about on here now? Considering you kept repeating you didn't care. You seem to only not care about the part that allows the kids to destroy their bodies, but demand that they should be able to do that. Maybe you should see a doctor about these obvious mental health problems you're suffering..
At the women's events that I attend who oppose this medical scam and denial of reality and attack on women's rights, alongside the many mothers and included within them, are lesbians. So spare that crap about homophobia, particularly because the gay guy in this room is calling this bollocks out for what it is. And communists I know seek to remove themselves from Big Pharma's T in that acronym: