ingliz wrote:Channelling Darwin...
I can see how, for particularly stupid animals, indiscriminately fucking anything that moves and hoping something sticks works.
In herd animals, fleeting dominance and submission rituals would be useful.
Even female same-sex sexual behaviour could offer advantages if one of the pair sought male company in the breeding season.
But in humans, exclusive male same-sex sexual behaviour with no heterosexual sex in the offing doesn't seem to offer any evolutionary advantage.
It doesn't seem to be 'animal' behaviour.
Any kind of sexual satisfaction (including gay) has several possible evolutionary advantages.
1. It removes inter-band violence by allowing males to satisfy a human need
2. It allows for sexual harmony WITHOUT increasing the population of the band
...
The problem you are having is that you are applying the Machine-world mentality of modernity ('We must increase the population more! That is what survival means - MOAR!') to the survival of a species, which doesn't make sense.
Populations were encouraged to increase their numbers by kings looking for soldiers to kill foreigners. This had nothing to do with our survival as a species. Overpopulation currently threatens our species with extinction, so please try to remember that everything we have done in civilizations has run COUNTER To Darwin's theory on survival of species.

For us, the French Revolution just proves that
kings and queens need better guards.