[Hakeer]

Look at this graph…

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/03/trump- ... -president

Both sides are pouring ad money in PA like no other state.

Whoever wins in PA is going to be hard to beat. You nearly have to run the table in most of the other swing states.

[JohnRawls]

Look at this graph…

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/03/trump- ... -president

Both sides are pouring ad money in PA like no other state.

Whoever wins in PA is going to be hard to beat. You nearly have to run the table in most of the other swing states.

@Rancid money going to good use. Kamala is the boss at raising money apparently. Considering like 45 million of that money for Trump is Musk then I don't know. Does he even have any monetary support from like small people?

[QatzelOk]

...Kamala is the boss at raising money apparently. ...

If she wants to continue to be a great fundraiser after being elected president, she will have to applaud the genocide of Palestinians. Forever.

I'm not sure if "a great fund-raiser" can make the administrative changes that the USA will need to avoid triggering human extinction.



Can a Lemonade Stand call itself "a democracy?" Pick your lemon candidate!

***

[JohnRawls]

If she wants to continue to be a great fundraiser after being elected president, she will have to applaud the genocide of Palestinians. Forever.

I'm not sure if "a great fund-raiser" can make the administrative changes that the USA will need to avoid triggering human extinction.



Can a Lemonade Stand call itself "a democracy?" Pick your lemon candidate!

***

Yeah Qatz, its all a conspiracy. You are the only one that knows better.

[QatzelOk]

Yeah Qatz, its all a conspiracy. You are the only one that knows better.

Was JFK a great fund-raiser?

What about Mao? Stalin? Jesus? Caesar? De Gaule?

Does "doing what billionaires pay you to do" qualify as "great leadership?"

If it does, then even a brain-dead grifter is qualified.

[JohnRawls]

Was JFK a great fund-raiser?

What about Mao? Stalin? Jesus? Caesar? De Gaule?

Does "doing what billionaires pay you to do" qualify as "great leadership?"

If it does, then even a brain-dead grifter is qualified.

Nice man, a collection of mass murderers, I don't know. Don't kid yourself all 4 you mentioned commited mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide with exception of De Gaul who was only in to mass murder and ethnic cleansings.

[SpecialOlympian]

@Rancid money going to good use. Kamala is the boss at raising money apparently. Considering like 45 million of that money for Trump is Musk then I don't know. Does he even have any monetary support from like small people?

Musk backed out of that promise, like every other public promise he has ever made.

[annatar1914]

This is how I see things as they stand now.

They have to maintain the illusion of a free and fair election, so Harris gets a fake bump in the polls despite being a candidate having never gone through the primaries of her party: they couldn't chance her losing there as she did in 2020 when she ran for President. So she gets the assist from the fourth estate media so that the whole American political system looks " left" to the voter as it actually moves further right.

Meanwhile, Trump holds back and trusts in the selection process while keeping a tight rein on his mouth, knowing that the incident in Butler will propel him back to the White House.

They need Trump for what's coming geopolitically.

[JohnRawls]

This is how I see things as they stand now.

They have to maintain the illusion of a free and fair election, so Harris gets a fake bump in the polls despite being a candidate having never gone through the primaries of her party: they couldn't chance her losing there as she did in 2020 when she ran for President. So she gets the assist from the fourth estate media so that the whole American political system looks " left" to the voter as it actually moves further right.

Meanwhile, Trump holds back and trusts in the selection process while keeping a tight rein on his mouth, knowing that the incident in Butler will propel him back to the White House.

They need Trump for what's coming geopolitically.

You are on drugs.

[Hakeer]

She picked Walz. I am a combination of disappointed and angry at Harris. This may cost her PA and the election.

[annatar1914]

You are on drugs.

@JohnRawls ,

Lazy and malign answer. I'm telling people that if you support Israel and the Ukraine you should follow the elites selection and support Trump, and here you are all out of lockstep with historical patterns, as usual.

Harris is running for second place, just like Republicans used to run for second place after Reagan.

[annatar1914]

She picked Walz. I am a combination of disappointed and angry at Harris. This may cost her PA and the election.

@Hakeer :

Shapiro would have been an indication that she had been selected but she didn't pick him. She's throwing the fight, it's rigged, always was.

[Hakeer]

@Hakeer :

Shapiro would have been an indication that she had been selected but she didn't pick him. She's throwing the fight, it's rigged, always was.

What is this? Some dumb-ass conspiracy theory?

My guess is that she is more comfortable with him for the next 8 years than Shapiro. Apparently that’s more important than winning PA and the election.

[annatar1914]

What is this? Some dumb-ass conspiracy theory?

My guess is that she is more comfortable with him for the next 8 years than Shapiro. Apparently that’s more important than winning PA and the election.

@Hakeer :

Angry ad hominem remarks indicate a mind being butthurt by reality.

And the reality is is that she tipped her hand by choosing a running mate antithetical in his position on the Middle East to the Israeli establishment, and thus indicated that she isn't serious about winning against Trump. And Trump is more in sync with that establishment.

[Hakeer]

@Hakeer :

Angry ad hominem remarks indicate a mind being butthurt by reality.

And the reality is is that she tipped her hand by choosing a running mate antithetical in his position on the Middle East to the Israeli establishment, and thus indicated that she isn't serious about winning against Trump. And Trump is more in sync with that establishment.

Or she picked this guy to appease Jewish voters. The Jewish PAC endorsed him. Shapiro did not help himself in that regard yesterday, calling Netanyahu the worst Israeli prime minister in history.

The idea that she doesn’t want to beat Trump stinks conspiracy theory.

[Istanbuller]

Or she picked this guy to appease Jewish voters. The Jewish PAC endorsed him. Shapiro did not help himself in that regard yesterday, calling Netanyahu the worst Israeli prime minister in history.

The idea that she doesn’t want to beat Trump stinks conspiracy theory.

He did it right. He would get Muslim votes in return. Plus, American left is in love with Palestine resistance but they don't like Kamala. Because of his support for Palestine, leftists would vote for Kamala.

[wat0n]

Or she picked this guy to appease Jewish voters. The Jewish PAC endorsed him. Shapiro did not help himself in that regard yesterday, calling Netanyahu the worst Israeli prime minister in history.

The idea that she doesn’t want to beat Trump stinks conspiracy theory.

It will backfire, even in CNN there was open talk about how being Jewish was a liability for Shapiro.

[Rugoz]

My guess is that she is more comfortable with him for the next 8 years than Shapiro. Apparently that’s more important than winning PA and the election.

Shapiro is too much "coastal elite" like her. Vibes are more important than policy. I think it's a good pick.

[Istanbuller]

Trump, despite choosing Vance as VP pick, will win swing states due to Kamala's poorer choice of VP pick.

[Rugoz]

Trump, despite choosing Vance as VP pick, will win swing states due to Kamala's poorer choice of VP pick.

Nonsense, if anything Trump-Vance will lose because of Vance and Harris-Walz will lose because of Harris.