Kamala Harris: a populist who is super unpopular among Democrats? - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#15321476
Fasces wrote:I'd vote for a wet bag of dog shit over Trump, so Harris sucking is irrelevent.


Indeed. I'd vote for an empty chair as well. The presidency staying vacant for 4 years is FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR better than that Orange monkey.

This new hyper polar politicas Trump and his MAGA tards have ushered in, have made it so that voting against people is as important as voting for them now. :|
#15321649
Fasces wrote:I'd vote for a wet bag of dog shit over Trump, so Harris sucking is irrelevent.


Rancid wrote:I'd vote for an empty chair...|


Congratulations, both of you, on getting the candidate you deserve.

May *empty chairs full of dog shit* bring peace and prosperity to both of you!
#15322169
QatzelOk wrote:Congratulations, both of you, on getting the candidate you deserve.

May *empty chairs full of dog shit* bring peace and prosperity to both of you!


Negotiator wrote:The joke is really that they already did that, and if they had paid attention, they would know that.

And now they may vote for a timebomb.


I'm curious, as a Brit/Canuck, who you guys would vote for?
#15322276
Pewty wrote:I'm curious, as a Brit/Canuck, who you guys would vote for?

I would protest the shittiness of the major candidates by voting for a third party candidate.

It's what I do in Canada by voting for the Bloc Québecois whenever the major party candidates are of extremely low quality like the two "steaming piles of dogshit" who are campaigning to see who gets to kill Arabs for AIPAC.
#15322315
QatzelOk wrote:I would protest the shittiness of the major candidates by voting for a third party candidate.

It's what I do in Canada by voting for the Bloc Québecois whenever the major party candidates are of extremely low quality like the two "steaming piles of dogshit" who are campaigning to see who gets to kill Arabs for AIPAC.


Yeah, I do that too, but for different reasons. The Conservatives are always going to win my riding so I just vote for someone else so they'll feel better about themselves.
#15322328
Pewty wrote:Yeah, I do that too, but for different reasons. The Conservatives are always going to win my riding so I just vote for someone else so they'll feel better about themselves.

With the shitty candidates that our oligarchs give us each election, voters scramble to find some "game" they can play inside the voting booth.

Vote for the least shitty is one game.

Vote against Canada is another game (by voting BQ).

Vote for the candidate with most kick-ass ads is the game most voters play, unfortunately, since most voters live in a make-believe world of media lies.
#15322337
QatzelOk wrote:With the shitty candidates that our oligarchs give us each election, voters scramble to find some "game" they can play inside the voting booth.

Vote for the least shitty is one game.

Vote against Canada is another game (by voting BQ).

Vote for the candidate with most kick-ass ads is the game most voters play, unfortunately, since most voters live in a make-believe world of media lies.


Have you ever considered running for public office?
#15322369
AFAIK wrote:Qatz joined a political party once but left once he discovered he only agreed with 90% of their platform.


Our current political actors have learned to avoid that problem (platform rejection) by simply NOT HAVING A PLATFORM.

This means voters are left to vote for the advertisements and logos of the various parties, something that Madison Avenue can control.

Imagine a type of election that the oligarchs couldn't control. "It's easy if you try."

Is the letter right? The letter is just unverifia[…]

You mean Hamas could have built military bases out[…]

That seems like a deliberate attempt to confuse un[…]

Trump position is to end the war in Ukraine. Harr[…]