wat0n wrote:This is even truer when Hamas doesn't just use Gazan cities as defensive positions but also uses them to carry out offensive actions like launching rockets into Israeli cities. I'm curious about what Israel is supposed to do in this situation, just let Hamas launch rockets against Israel's civilian population indefinitely?
Of course while the current framework exists Israel is going to respond. And however hard Israel tries, Palestinians and their supporters will never accept Israel's response as legitimate, as acceptable. But by the same token however hard the Palestinian resistance tried, Israel and its supporters would never accept Palestinian attacks as legitimate or acceptable. Yes we should restrain how we fight wars and deal with insurgents, what we should stop is this ridiculous idea that war can be fought by either side according to some commonly agreed objective standard. Its just ridiculous.
Given the situation that has now been going on for 57 years its inevitable that there will be violent resistance. But that resistance is no match for Israel militarily. Trying to fight conventionally is absurd. The huge military imbalance means that the Palestinian resistance must use what ever means it can to hurt Israel. It can't hurt it militarily, at least on the offensive, so it has to maximise the suffering of Israelis when ever it gets a chance.
Yes the ideal way for the Palestinians to improve their situation would be to eshue violence and engage in Ghandian resistance. If the Palestinians were strictly non violent they could probably change their situation dramatically in a few years. But that will never happen because it only needs a minority, a small minority to engage in violence to derail this.