- 07 Nov 2024 13:23
#15329045
Never accept medicines from people who applaud genocide
- an adage you'll never hear on MSM
The Valencia region of Spain was recently hit with tragic floods, resulting in hundreds of deaths.
While this is a major tragedy, another tragedy is our media's inability to communicate possible causes of this flood, resorting to the very lazy "climate change" to explain what may have actually been caused by something much more sinister.
***
I actually visited Valencia four years ago (just before the COVID lockdowns) and did some research before arriving. Valencia drained its most important river in the late 20th Century in order to build a highway through the center of town. Protests occurred, and the highway project was transformed into an "urban park" project, which is quite a nice park.
The excuse it used for this "river re-routing" was a deadly flood of 1957. (This was the era when car companies were tearing down low-income neighborhoods and calling it Urban Renewal).
source: How Valencia turned a crisis into a transformative park
Notice that the re-routed floodway passes south of the city. This is where the disastrous flooding occurred, right next to the re-modeled floodway replacement for the natural river route.
***
I realize that this is not the "definite" cause of the flooding, or the extensive damage it caused. But it may be a contributing factor.
**How is it that no mainstream media reporting on the flooding
has mentionned this obvious variable?**
How did every reporter miss the fact that Valencia changed the route of a major river 50 years ago?
1. Is it because the car companies pushed for the river-draining, and media is sponsored by car companies?
2. Is it because mankind is currently techno-worshipping, and any criticism of our technological interventions is considered blasphemous?
3. How many other important details does our "professional" media skip or neglect?
soundtrack
While this is a major tragedy, another tragedy is our media's inability to communicate possible causes of this flood, resorting to the very lazy "climate change" to explain what may have actually been caused by something much more sinister.
***
I actually visited Valencia four years ago (just before the COVID lockdowns) and did some research before arriving. Valencia drained its most important river in the late 20th Century in order to build a highway through the center of town. Protests occurred, and the highway project was transformed into an "urban park" project, which is quite a nice park.
The excuse it used for this "river re-routing" was a deadly flood of 1957. (This was the era when car companies were tearing down low-income neighborhoods and calling it Urban Renewal).
source: How Valencia turned a crisis into a transformative park
Notice that the re-routed floodway passes south of the city. This is where the disastrous flooding occurred, right next to the re-modeled floodway replacement for the natural river route.
wiki wrote:In October 1957, a flood from the Turia river resulted in 81 casualties and extensive property damage.[54] The disaster led to the remodelling of the city and the creation of a new river bed for the Turia, with the old one becoming one of the city's "green lungs".
***
I realize that this is not the "definite" cause of the flooding, or the extensive damage it caused. But it may be a contributing factor.
**How is it that no mainstream media reporting on the flooding
has mentionned this obvious variable?**
How did every reporter miss the fact that Valencia changed the route of a major river 50 years ago?
1. Is it because the car companies pushed for the river-draining, and media is sponsored by car companies?
2. Is it because mankind is currently techno-worshipping, and any criticism of our technological interventions is considered blasphemous?
3. How many other important details does our "professional" media skip or neglect?
soundtrack
Never accept medicines from people who applaud genocide
- an adage you'll never hear on MSM
- By annatar1914
- By litwin
- By Deutschmania