pro BREXIT
pro Putin
pro Trump
pro life
anti woke
(posting for a friend lol)
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods
Mosaic Mystic wrote:The title says it all: What’s your most controversial opinion?
ingliz wrote:On this forum?
Believing that America is not a force for good in the world.
annatar1914 wrote:I'd have to say that my most controversial opinion is that to be truly progressive a society must be:
1. Socialist
2. Pro-Life and Pro-Family
3. Supportive of a Constitutional and Republican Order
4. Orthodox Christian.
Furthermore that genuine support for one of these tends to lead to the other three over time. And, that not being supportive of one of these leads to the loss of the other three.
Deutschmania wrote:Here are my most controversial opinions .Which consist of defending Communist regimes from accusations of them committing atrocity . I mean , I don't necessarily feel that all of them have been above reproach , but a number of the claims that anti-communist propagandists have made just makes no sense to me at all .
In your vision of a "progressive society," would freedom of religion be upheld, or would everyone be expected to adhere to Orthodox Christianity?
How would non-Orthodox Christians, Hindus, pagans, or atheists be treated—would they face higher taxes or other forms of discrimination compared to their Orthodox peers?
Additionally, how do you define being "pro-life" and "pro-family"?
Would single men or women who choose not to start families be penalized, such as through higher taxes, to incentivize family creation?
Lastly, what does "socialism" mean in your framework?
ingliz wrote:On this forum?
Believing that America is not a force for good in the world.
Mosaic Mystic wrote:It’s deeply troubling that you deny the USSR’s responsibility for Katyn or dismiss the reality of the Holodomor. Do you have any credible sources to support your claims? I won’t accept Grover Furr as a source—he’s an English professor, not a historian. As for the Uyghur issue, citing CGTN doesn’t work either. CGTN is the English-language arm of China Global Television Network, which is state-run and based in Beijing. State-controlled media has a clear interest in presenting China in a favorable light. You need to provide unbiased, independent sources to substantiate your arguments.
@Truth To Power we have a very basic difference[…]
…..and the article you quoted has the medical exa[…]
I admit I am a StarTrek junkie, so that may be wh[…]