- 09 Apr 2014 17:38
#14388840
not really, using a term "recent history" is a logical fallacy, and this term is used by ignorant people who lack substantive arguments, but they don't lack hate and prejudices.
Well, that's completely untrue - that's a lie, what you claim here. No genocide were committed, but in WWII over Serbs by your Nazi-lovers.
But, pathetic is your argument in the shape of " a recent history"
so, recent history doesn't count for Croats/Albanians/Muslims, but it counts for Serbs
Even though Croats/Albanians/Muslims committed holocaust against Serbs, and even though they were the most raging Nazis that even disgusted Germans
You are really pathetic, and a real racist.
Well, Croats started with concentration camps, murdering, terrorism on the soil of Yugoslavia, and Croats altogether with NATO-trainers committed genocide over Serbs in 1992-1995. And Croatia is now in NATO, right?
You Nazis stick together, right?
Well, you do hate Serbs for being Serbs. The only genocide committed in the Balkans, was a genocide committed by Croat/Muslims over Serbs, and yet
I don't see you hate those peoples
So, something is wrong with your theories which can only be explained by your racism and hatred towards Serbs, which is OK with me - I have seen plenty of you.
You just need to stop trolling , and openly admit it without wrapping up your hate in shallow and empty quasi-arguments like are: "recent history, non-existent genocides" etc etc
Be a brave racist not a pathetic coward [/quote]
Interesting, how you hate Greeks for a flag that was kilometers away from the place where, actually the most prominent killers were: a Croat (Drazen Erdemovic), a Slovenian (Franz Kos) and a Muslim (Zijad Zigic), and you don't hate actual killers. I suppose, because they are not Orthodox, right?
Kind of chauvinistic, right?
Besides, the biggest humanitarian catastrophe since WW2 in Europe is the joint Croat-NATO action of killing of hundreds Serbs and ethnic eradication of 75% of Serb population from Croatia in 1995. (Your Nazis, didn't even spare lives of handicapped elders http://www.bt.dk/node/13665041 )
Maas wrote:no, recent history are historic facts.
not really, using a term "recent history" is a logical fallacy, and this term is used by ignorant people who lack substantive arguments, but they don't lack hate and prejudices.
I wouldn't qualify the Serbian ethnic army comitting genocide as pathetic.
Well, that's completely untrue - that's a lie, what you claim here. No genocide were committed, but in WWII over Serbs by your Nazi-lovers.
But, pathetic is your argument in the shape of " a recent history"
That might also qualify as recent history, but to claim that Croats of today are like the generation of (some) Croats of WWII, is a racist opinion that is untrue. Guilty by association is a fail argument. The guilty by association for Serbs doesn't fly... because they are the same people who previously comitted genocide. Ergo, you're just vomitting up apologetic remarks in attempt to make Serbia, lead by monsters who comitted genocide all over ex-Yugoslavia, as the victems. They are not the victems.
so, recent history doesn't count for Croats/Albanians/Muslims, but it counts for Serbs
Even though Croats/Albanians/Muslims committed holocaust against Serbs, and even though they were the most raging Nazis that even disgusted Germans
You are really pathetic, and a real racist.
You say that, eventhough it was not NATO but the Serbs who put people in concentration camps and comitted genocide.
What a joke of a comment.
Well, Croats started with concentration camps, murdering, terrorism on the soil of Yugoslavia, and Croats altogether with NATO-trainers committed genocide over Serbs in 1992-1995. And Croatia is now in NATO, right?
You Nazis stick together, right?
It's exceptionally normal to think that specific people who commit genocide must be hated.
And it's a fact that Serbs / Serbia had no shortage of those kinds of people who headed their country/army.
But apperantly you look the other way because they are Serbs, while Noemon looks the other way because they are orthodox.
And you are trying to make others to look the other way as well.
But it's asking way too ask others to look the other way for what some Serbs/Serbia did.
It's dubious you can not understand that, and instead of that conclude it must be because we hate Serbs for being Serbs
Well, you do hate Serbs for being Serbs. The only genocide committed in the Balkans, was a genocide committed by Croat/Muslims over Serbs, and yet
I don't see you hate those peoples
So, something is wrong with your theories which can only be explained by your racism and hatred towards Serbs, which is OK with me - I have seen plenty of you.
You just need to stop trolling , and openly admit it without wrapping up your hate in shallow and empty quasi-arguments like are: "recent history, non-existent genocides" etc etc
Be a brave racist not a pathetic coward [/quote]
Maas wrote:WTF, Noemon...
The biggest humanitarian catastrophe since WW2 in Europe was the massacre of thousands of civilians when the Greek flag flew over their houses. There really is no question about it. And so NATO wasn't going to give the same Serbs the oppertunity to do that again. It would be unforgivable to stand idle by and let that happen again, and so it becomes morally totally justified for an intervention.
Interesting, how you hate Greeks for a flag that was kilometers away from the place where, actually the most prominent killers were: a Croat (Drazen Erdemovic), a Slovenian (Franz Kos) and a Muslim (Zijad Zigic), and you don't hate actual killers. I suppose, because they are not Orthodox, right?
Kind of chauvinistic, right?
Besides, the biggest humanitarian catastrophe since WW2 in Europe is the joint Croat-NATO action of killing of hundreds Serbs and ethnic eradication of 75% of Serb population from Croatia in 1995. (Your Nazis, didn't even spare lives of handicapped elders http://www.bt.dk/node/13665041 )
"The Aggressor is the one who attacks before the USA does", Milos Zeman, the Czech President