- 14 Nov 2016 20:03
#14737196
I am indeed. Anyone who knows anything knows that conspiracies are the bricks and mortar of modern US foreign policy, and the ones we know about are probably just some small fraction of the total. Or maybe you are so naïve you do not know that, e.g., the Gulf of Tonkin Incident that served as pretext for the Vietnam War was in fact a conspiracy? The Iran-Contra weapons for hostages deal? The removal of Mohammed Mossadegh and installation of Shah Rezah Pahlavi? Try reading "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," by John Perkins, and at least educate yourself a little bit. I've asked before: do you think Oswald acted alone? If you don't, then you are a conspiracy theorist, too. And if you do, you are just pathetically uninformed and/or unthinking.
If conspiracy kooks did not exist, conspirators would have to invent them.
Oh. Right.
Pants-of-dog wrote:Oh, you are a conspiracy theorist. I see.
I am indeed. Anyone who knows anything knows that conspiracies are the bricks and mortar of modern US foreign policy, and the ones we know about are probably just some small fraction of the total. Or maybe you are so naïve you do not know that, e.g., the Gulf of Tonkin Incident that served as pretext for the Vietnam War was in fact a conspiracy? The Iran-Contra weapons for hostages deal? The removal of Mohammed Mossadegh and installation of Shah Rezah Pahlavi? Try reading "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," by John Perkins, and at least educate yourself a little bit. I've asked before: do you think Oswald acted alone? If you don't, then you are a conspiracy theorist, too. And if you do, you are just pathetically uninformed and/or unthinking.
If conspiracy kooks did not exist, conspirators would have to invent them.
Oh. Right.