One Degree wrote:I started to look through the extremely lengthy link you provided, but gave up when I saw it was simply a press release from a polling group I had never heard of. At a quick glance, it takes the views of 897 people in North Carolina to come up with these results. I do not view this as credible evidence of anything.
It's a well-known polling company:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Policy_PollingIt was polling for the NC primary, and 897 is a reasonable sample size to use - few polls use more than 1000. I gave you the important finding - 10% thinks whites are a superior race. You wanted numbers.
noir wrote:<quote from Rich>
Any objection?
Oh yes, I have many objections to Rich. Just in that post, he's being prejudiced and bigoted.
After 9/11 there were reports of celebration amongst Muslim community in Brooklyn (yeah, Linda Sarsour of Women March hometown, have you any doubt that her clan were on it? ), she herself is connected with family ties to the Islamists (Hamas). On which parallel world the Americans are living for letting this situation to unfold?
"Have you any doubt?" What a load of bollocks. Brooklyn is "hometown" to 2.5 million people. Trying to tie her to unsourced "reports" somewhere among 2.5 million people is prejudice. We do know that people showed Trump's claims of seeing people celebrating in New York were lies, and that no one found decent evidence of it happening.
This is the trouble with Trump's Deplorables - spreading, or inventing, rumours about a few Muslims, and then trying to use them to justify authoritarian actions against the entire group. It is a classic fascist tactic. It does show the opening article is fully justified.