- 12 Dec 2017 17:27
#14870347
Is it possible to be a right-wing Marxist? I've been called this, though I don't consider myself a Marxist and definitely don't consider myself right-wing.
Because I advocate for rural America, common folk, the peasantry, I am called "reactionary" and "right wing". I don't adhere to Marx's view that urban people will lead the revolution and that rural people are lumpenproletarians who contribute nothing of value.
But because I advocate for an end to exploitation while promoting a form of left nationalism, social justice, wealth redistribution and total nationalization/collectivization I am called a "Marxist" (by people who have no clue as to what Marxism actually is).
I have no real political label that fits - no party, no political home.
I feel the greatest enemy of the rural, fly-over-country types is the republican party because they exploit their values (and lack thereof), beliefs and reactionism for political advancement while doing nothing to help these people. I don't understand how rural people could ever be right-wing. I can't tell you how badly I hate the right-wing for their deregulation, pro-corporation, and aggressively capitalistic policies and rhetoric.
I despise the democrats for exploiting minority urban people and social minorities while doing nothing to help these people. I don't understand how social minorities could ever be "liberal".
I despise urban and suburban white people for their smugness and gross over-privilege; they virtue signal from their ivy league schools and gated white enclaves; so-called "intellectuals" have established themselves as "moral vanguards", and are rife with self-importance while producing nothing of actual value. They have entrenched themselves in culture, the arts, education, media, entertainment, and the bureaucratic establishments. They control the narratives - they disseminate identity politics by which division is perpetuated among proletarian ranks. And they attack working class whites, call them "privileged" by which they implicate all whites with themselves (as a shield for themselves..."we're in this together - we're all privileged") - which forces the white commoner on the defensive and pushes them even further into reactionism. No, YOU'RE privileged. All whites need not be overcome - it's nowhere near that difficult you self-righteous, non-producing cretins. You'll find no safety in numbers here; only YOU need be overcome.
It is my sincerist hope that one day rural whites lay aside their reactionism and wake up, join forces with the urbane non-whites and other social minorities, and bring justice to these urban and suburban types who perpetuate privilege and injustice and love the smell of their own flatulence.
You can call me a "right-wing Marxist" if you want. For a time I called myself a "left-nationalist" and still prefer that term. I am not concerned with being labeled, or changing my views in adherence to a tribe or faction. But I would like to find those of similar passions, to have a political "home", so to speak. A party to support - even in another country.
Because I advocate for rural America, common folk, the peasantry, I am called "reactionary" and "right wing". I don't adhere to Marx's view that urban people will lead the revolution and that rural people are lumpenproletarians who contribute nothing of value.
But because I advocate for an end to exploitation while promoting a form of left nationalism, social justice, wealth redistribution and total nationalization/collectivization I am called a "Marxist" (by people who have no clue as to what Marxism actually is).
I have no real political label that fits - no party, no political home.
I feel the greatest enemy of the rural, fly-over-country types is the republican party because they exploit their values (and lack thereof), beliefs and reactionism for political advancement while doing nothing to help these people. I don't understand how rural people could ever be right-wing. I can't tell you how badly I hate the right-wing for their deregulation, pro-corporation, and aggressively capitalistic policies and rhetoric.
I despise the democrats for exploiting minority urban people and social minorities while doing nothing to help these people. I don't understand how social minorities could ever be "liberal".
I despise urban and suburban white people for their smugness and gross over-privilege; they virtue signal from their ivy league schools and gated white enclaves; so-called "intellectuals" have established themselves as "moral vanguards", and are rife with self-importance while producing nothing of actual value. They have entrenched themselves in culture, the arts, education, media, entertainment, and the bureaucratic establishments. They control the narratives - they disseminate identity politics by which division is perpetuated among proletarian ranks. And they attack working class whites, call them "privileged" by which they implicate all whites with themselves (as a shield for themselves..."we're in this together - we're all privileged") - which forces the white commoner on the defensive and pushes them even further into reactionism. No, YOU'RE privileged. All whites need not be overcome - it's nowhere near that difficult you self-righteous, non-producing cretins. You'll find no safety in numbers here; only YOU need be overcome.
It is my sincerist hope that one day rural whites lay aside their reactionism and wake up, join forces with the urbane non-whites and other social minorities, and bring justice to these urban and suburban types who perpetuate privilege and injustice and love the smell of their own flatulence.
You can call me a "right-wing Marxist" if you want. For a time I called myself a "left-nationalist" and still prefer that term. I am not concerned with being labeled, or changing my views in adherence to a tribe or faction. But I would like to find those of similar passions, to have a political "home", so to speak. A party to support - even in another country.
Last edited by LeftNationalist on 12 Dec 2017 22:17, edited 1 time in total.