- 13 Jun 2019 19:51
#15011924
Every time someone says atheism is evil he should be presented with various quotes from the bible
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Truth To Power wrote:It would hardly make sense for women to be sex objects if they weren't people.
And people who have come to terms with the fact of evolution (i.e., not Marxists).
Nonsense wrote:There are certainly some very dysfunctionalised minds about judging by the comments on sex here.
As I have iterated before on the topic, 'sex' is nature's 'trick-or-treat', it is the evolutionary development evolved as an alternative to cloning & allows perpetual change through natural selection(of partners-if you like).
By having the ability to reproduce by coitus, creatures intruduce variants, giving rise to beneficial or detrimental changes which pan out over time.
Through the ability to 'treat' both the male & female in coitus through orgasmic copulation nature has performed a 'trick' of reproduction that's different than it's earlier ancestral cousin of cloning.
By so doing it ensures the survival of the species in a range of environments that cloning could not achieve, that's evolution in action.
Additionally, coitus between male & female ensures that human capital(in our case)is invested in ensuring that any offspring also succeed to live into adulthood.
There is a social bond that we know as the 'family', which is an additional benefit(or responsibility)that cloning may or may not engender at a conscious level.
Were there no 'treat' involved in coitus between male-female, we would simply not survive, by not being able to pass on our genes, because, what would be the 'point'(pun intended) of sex, if there was no 'treat', as neither sex would be interested in coitus, that is the genius of evolution, that it has introduced a reproduction mechanism for creatures equivalent to giving bees the nectar off of the plants that attract the bees in order to propagate the plants.
SSDR wrote:Just because someone is a person, doesn't mean they are a "sex object." The viewpoint that a woman is nothing but a "sex object" is very alarming. It sounds very right winged.
Hindsite wrote:It is not evolution, God designed it that way.
Praise the Lord.
SSDR wrote:Just because someone is a person, doesn't mean they are a "sex object."
The viewpoint that a woman is nothing but a "sex object" is very alarming.
It sounds very right winged.
Truth To Power wrote:True. Because of the asymmetry in human reproductive roles, the males did not evolve to be sex objects. It is a very rare male who can provide consistent sexual gratification to more than a very few females.
Sure, because the "nothing but" claim is something you made up.
Facts often do.
SSDR wrote:Some women like to "milk men."
Hindsite wrote:That reminds me of the joy of sucking milk from my wife's full breasts.Did you also wear a diaper?
Godstud wrote::eh: Did you also wear a diaper?
Godstud wrote:oh right... Georgia. Marrying your mother is illegal in most other places.
SSDR wrote:Some women love to use men as sex objects. Some women like to "milk men."
I am not making up any claims.
Your views on women are very alarming.
And right wing statements are not facts.
They are opinions that lack reality.
Truth To Power wrote:The reality is that women evolved to be sex objects for very good biological reasons; but some people find this reality distasteful or even alarming, and consequently refuse to know it.
Trump still has sentencing. LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM[…]
Current Jewish population estimates in Mexico com[…]
Ukraine stands with Syrian rebels against Moscow- […]