JohnRawls wrote:On shit Qatz, you are right, protecting the rights of Uk people and workers requires one to be an anti-semite. You have opened my eyes brother. The Protocols of the elders of ZION are true.
I edited that last post to make what I mean clearer.
The definition of "anti-semitic" has been changed recently to mean "not in favor of Israeli expansion or AIPAC lobbying."
By that defintion, it is impossible to defend ordinary people against the powerful and rich. This means that ANY socialism will be impossible.
The minute the Labour Party elects a leader that is actually a socialist, the forces of Capital will be informing everyone what an anti-Semite he or she is.
If this isn't possible, the leader will be smeared in other ways.
This is why I am far less concernced with "the morality" of our leaders, and far more interested in "the morality" of their programs.
The obsession with the bedroom behaviors and support-for-Israel of our leaders by mainstream media.... almost guarantees empty rhetoric and virtue-signalling from them, and nothing else.
"Their economy produces things cheaper than ours, so we need to send them some manufactured viruses to level the playing field." - Freedom and Democracy Inc.