- 01 Oct 2023 16:33
#15288975
How much money for reconstruction? What weapon systems to repel missile attacks?
They respect the power of both or they would've retaliated fiercely for Israeli attacks, or ignored threats over enriching to weapons grade.
Unfortunately too many of Iran's conventional weapons are horrendously obsolete or inferior. They don't have a single jet or tank that can stand up to the merk, Barak F-15 or f-35.
Alas Israel has been preparing to take on hez on its own turf, as the Oron recon plane and barak appear to be designed to find hidden hez positions, leading to prompt destruction.
Why didn't they send those missiles after their nuclear scientists or personnel in syria were killed?
KSA obviously isn't satisfied as it made a deeper US commitment a condition for "normalization."
No, a rapprochement which amounted to china knocking their heads together isn't likely to be as durable--if durable at all--compared to a real rapprochement, on the initiative of the parties themselves.
Unfortunately Abbas wasn't speaking for UAE, Bahrain and other states willing to ditch the palestinians….
skinster wrote:It's great news and you can read above about some of those benefits.
How much money for reconstruction? What weapon systems to repel missile attacks?
This is just your opinion, by the look of it. The Iranians don't fear the Yankees or the Zionists.
They respect the power of both or they would've retaliated fiercely for Israeli attacks, or ignored threats over enriching to weapons grade.
Iran is not Iraq, it has a million+ strong standing army and a lot of weapons
Unfortunately too many of Iran's conventional weapons are horrendously obsolete or inferior. They don't have a single jet or tank that can stand up to the merk, Barak F-15 or f-35.
and a lot of allies since it provides many of them in the region with weapons and other support.
Alas Israel has been preparing to take on hez on its own turf, as the Oron recon plane and barak appear to be designed to find hidden hez positions, leading to prompt destruction.
The Iranians have already stated if the Zionists and their masters in Washington attack them, the first place they would send missiles into is Tel Aviv.
Why didn't they send those missiles after their nuclear scientists or personnel in syria were killed?
Is it obvious or is this your opinion again?
KSA obviously isn't satisfied as it made a deeper US commitment a condition for "normalization."
The end result is the same.
No, a rapprochement which amounted to china knocking their heads together isn't likely to be as durable--if durable at all--compared to a real rapprochement, on the initiative of the parties themselves.
"There will be no peace between any Arab nation and Israel until the Palestinian conflict is ended by Israel agreeing to share sovereignty over the land"
Unfortunately Abbas wasn't speaking for UAE, Bahrain and other states willing to ditch the palestinians….