- 19 Jun 2013 20:53
#14257486
You're not using the quote function correctly... just break up the tags. Is that really too much to ask?
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Rainbow Crow wrote:The heart of this conundrum seems to be naivete; liberals seem to think that resources are unlimited and therefore aid given to people who harm themselves can also be unlimited. How else could it be anything but tyranny to not give help to a person in need? The conundrum arises not only when resource issues come into play but also with the fact that they have caused their own limitless problem. Here, liberals also reject that pleasure-seeking can have negative effects that can't be repaired (otherwise, they would put a cap on the amount of aid that such a person can receive). As such, liberals not only define tyranny as failure; they also define tyranny as a prevention of pleasure seeking (such as marijuana being illegal).
Conservatives do not have this problem. While many of us want drugs like marijuana to remain illegal, we also don't want to give limitless aid to people who still find access to these drugs.
Any thoughts?
Rainbow Crow wrote:You're not using the quote function correctly... just break up the tags. Is that really too much to ask?
Yeah, because they are based on the ever-changing[…]
That’s not what Hitler found in 1939-1945. :) Hi[…]
Weird of you to post this, you always argued that[…]