- 26 Aug 2019 17:31
#15029652
He chose to go to the hospital. One of your colleagues already posted a picture with the few cuts and bruises Ngo had, and it did not require a hospital visit.
Do you agree that by your logic, all the hate groups that have committed violence are terrorists? Yes or no?
Breitbart is untrustworthy, so I had to do a little digging. Let us look at the first one:
Keith Campbell is a far right blogger who went to Berkeley in order to get into a fight with antifa.
According to his own words, he wanted antifa there “so we can kick their asses again”.
Is the rest if your list also people who specifically picked a fight and lost?
I am not going to address your insults.
If you have actual arguments to make, please do so.
No, one of your brethren already claimed that and was unable to support that claim.
As far as I can tell, the organisers are the only ones who are claiming that antifa threatened them, and since they seemed to have already lied about their conference, I see no reason to take them at their word.
I am not going to address your insults.
If you have actual arguments to make, please do so.
Considering the fact that no one has been able to present anyone opposed to racism as a speaker or panellist, the case has already been made.
—————————
So we agree that not all political violence is terrorism.
So, anyone who wants to fight fascists is now a terrorist?
Yes, it is inherently political.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
foxdemon wrote:He had to go to hospital. That sort of violence can result in fatalities. If Antifa were as harmless as you are trying to claim, Andy Ngo should have been able to walk right through the crowd without issues.
He chose to go to the hospital. One of your colleagues already posted a picture with the few cuts and bruises Ngo had, and it did not require a hospital visit.
Do you agree that by your logic, all the hate groups that have committed violence are terrorists? Yes or no?
Sure
Breitbart is untrustworthy, so I had to do a little digging. Let us look at the first one:
Keith Campbell is a far right blogger who went to Berkeley in order to get into a fight with antifa.
According to his own words, he wanted antifa there “so we can kick their asses again”.
Is the rest if your list also people who specifically picked a fight and lost?
[url]https://www.dailywire.com/news/20343/timeline-antifa-violence-january-–-august-2017-frank-camp[/url]
A 2017 timeline. Why do Antifa attack gays and trans people so much? Possibly because they are weedy white middle class blowhards that can’t beat up anyone stronger? This also explains why they haven’t killed anyone yet, though not for want of trying.
These are both right wing sources though. There doesn’t seem to be any neutral source. The ADL comes closest, and they condemn Antifa violence.
I am not going to address your insults.
If you have actual arguments to make, please do so.
They have threatened to lock everyone inside and burn the place down.
No, one of your brethren already claimed that and was unable to support that claim.
As far as I can tell, the organisers are the only ones who are claiming that antifa threatened them, and since they seemed to have already lied about their conference, I see no reason to take them at their word.
Only in your own mind.
I am not going to address your insults.
If you have actual arguments to make, please do so.
No you haven’t. I am still waiting for you to demonstrate the conference attendees have anything to do with far right ethno-supremacists or ecofacists.
Considering the fact that no one has been able to present anyone opposed to racism as a speaker or panellist, the case has already been made.
—————————
Aexodus wrote:All actions during wartime by legal and properly uniformed combatants fall outside the definition of terrorism.
So we agree that not all political violence is terrorism.
That is correct, judging by their own desire to ‘fight’ fascism with their fists.
So, anyone who wants to fight fascists is now a terrorist?
Warfare is not terrorism. Secondly, when soldiers fight in a war it’s not politically motivated per se anyway.
Yes, it is inherently political.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...