- 01 May 2024 05:53
#15313868
It would necessarily follow that jews were never targeted by Hitler. Israel, in fact is a meaningless country. Black people were never enslaved. White people never colonized anything. Mongolians never conquered anything. Civil rights laws are meaningless and incoherent.
Be consistent.
Even if you are going to say some incoherent nonsense like 'race does exist but it's a social construct'...well then first of all that means race is a choice...so if you didn't want to be enslaved in the early us then simply do not choose to be black.
Second, if there is no genetic clustering at all then nobody could possibly identify a person's race from physical characteristics. There just would not be enough genetics that people have in common.
There could be no way to determine the physical characteristics of a child by looking at their parents. Otherwise it would imply some genetic inheritance of race. So if Beyonce and puff daddy had a child, nobody should be surprised if it looks like Taylor swift or Jackie Chan.
There just is no logical way to combine the assertion that there is no genetic component to race with an admission that physical characteristics can distinguish races or are in any way heritable. The evil confederacy never could have identified which people were black so there never could have been slavery of black people. One thing simply logically follows from the other and there is no way to avoid this.
If you instead want to say that race does have some genetic component but it is trivial or something, then you are changing your argument. That is a totally different claim to the assertion that there is 'no genetic aspect of race'. So you cannot claim both of these things simultaneously.
Be consistent.
Even if you are going to say some incoherent nonsense like 'race does exist but it's a social construct'...well then first of all that means race is a choice...so if you didn't want to be enslaved in the early us then simply do not choose to be black.
Second, if there is no genetic clustering at all then nobody could possibly identify a person's race from physical characteristics. There just would not be enough genetics that people have in common.
There could be no way to determine the physical characteristics of a child by looking at their parents. Otherwise it would imply some genetic inheritance of race. So if Beyonce and puff daddy had a child, nobody should be surprised if it looks like Taylor swift or Jackie Chan.
There just is no logical way to combine the assertion that there is no genetic component to race with an admission that physical characteristics can distinguish races or are in any way heritable. The evil confederacy never could have identified which people were black so there never could have been slavery of black people. One thing simply logically follows from the other and there is no way to avoid this.
If you instead want to say that race does have some genetic component but it is trivial or something, then you are changing your argument. That is a totally different claim to the assertion that there is 'no genetic aspect of race'. So you cannot claim both of these things simultaneously.