Transgender murder, hate crime conviction a first - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

News stories of lesser political significance, but still of international interest.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

Forum rules: Please include a source with news articles. No stupid or joke stories. The usual forum rules also still apply.
#1882576
DENVER, Colorado (CNN) -- A Colorado man was convicted of first-degree murder and a bias-motivated crime and sentenced to life in prison for killing a transgender teen he met on an online social networking site.

ImageImage
Allen Andrade was convicted of first-degree murder and a hate crime in the slaying of a transgender teen.

1 of 2 It was the first time in the nation that a state hate crime statute resulted in a conviction in a transgender person's murder, the advocacy group Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation said.

Seated in the front row of the courtroom, the family of Justin "Angie" Zapata broke out in tears as the verdicts against Allen Andrade were read.

The jury deliberated for just under two hours before returning the verdict shortly after 3 p.m. Watch Andrade listen to the verdict »

"I lost somebody so precious," said Maria Zapata, the victim's mother. She glanced at Andrade and continued: "The only thing he can't take away is the love and the memories that I have of my baby. My beautiful, beautiful baby."

Andrade spoke just one word. "No," he said when asked if he wished to address the court.

Judge Marcelo Kopcow then imposed the mandatory sentence for the first-degree murder conviction -- life in prison without parole. Watch Andrade get sentenced to life without parole »

The verdict was hailed by gay and transgender rights groups.

"Hearing 'guilty on first-degree murder' and 'guilty of bias-motivated crime' was a hugely emotional experience for all the family, friends and the supporters of Angie," Barton added.

"She will not be forgotten."

Andrade admitted killing Zapata, but his defense argued that he acted in the heat of passion after discovering that Zapata was biologically male. The defense asked for a lesser verdict, such as second-degree murder or manslaughter.

Throughout the trial, prosecutors referred to Zapata as "she," while the defense referred to the transgender teen as "he."

"When [Andrade] met him, he met him as 'Angie,' " defense attorney Annette Kundelius argued on Wednesday. "When he found out it wasn't 'Angie,' that it was 'Justin,' he lost control."

But the jury rejected the argument, deciding in favor of prosecutors, who argued that Andrade knew Zapata was biologically male and that knowledge motivated the crime.

"This was an ambush attack," said Chief Deputy District Attorney Robb Miller. "This was an all-out blitz."

Zapata was "born in a boy's body but living as a female," added Miller. "Ultimately, she was murdered because of it."

The case has become a rallying point for supporters of the transgender community, who have held vigils and launched Web sites in remembrance of Zapata.

They are calling for the inclusion of transgender people in hate crime statutes across the country and at the federal level. Currently, 11 states and the District of Columbia recognize transgender people in their hate crime laws.

According to prosecutors, Zapata, 18, and Andrade 32, met online in summer 2008 and arranged to meet. Zapata brought Andrade to her apartment in Greeley, Colorado, where they spent nearly three days together.

According to a police affidavit, Zapata was out of the apartment when Andrade noticed photographs that made him "question victim Zapata's sex."

Andrade confronted Zapata, who declared, "I am all woman." Andrade then grabbed Zapata and discovered male genitalia.

According to court records, Andrade told police he began hitting Zapata with his fists, knocking her to the ground. He then grabbed a fire extinguisher and twice hit her in the head.

Andrade told police he thought he had "killed it," referring to Zapata, and covered her with a blanket. Realizing what he had done, he then cleaned up the crime scene, the affidavit said.

Andrade told police he heard "gurgling" sounds coming from the victim and saw Zapata sitting up. He hit her again with the fire extinguisher, he said, according to the affidavit.

Andrade took Zapata's car and fled. Police discovered the car two weeks later and arrested Andrade.


The jury heard jailhouse phone conversations, including Andrade telling a girlfriend "gay things must die." He did not testify in his own defense.

Zapata was 16 when she adopted the name "Angie," and made the decision to live as a woman

CNN


Even if Zapata had not been forthcoming about her trans-status, I don't think the gay panic defense has ever been successfully employed. If Zapata was indeed naive about her sexual/gender identity, it would seem that Andrade murdered Zapata because he could not reconcile his sexual attraction for someone who turned out to be male. I'm surprised Begbie didn't gut the tranny he was making out with in Trainspotting, but like him, it could have been wonderful. It could have been spectacular sex, but his obsession with anatomy could only be atoned through murder.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1882578
Not enough details to make a statement about the case, but I would certainly feel violated if someone wasn't forthcoming about their gender while I was courting them. To kill over it though? Hardly appropriate.

Crime of passion isn't a valid defense either way.
User avatar
By RonPaulalways
#1882714
Hate-crime legislation is silly. A crime motivated by non-prejudicial hate is no less hateful than one motivated by a prejudicial hate.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1882771
One has to wonder whether those who commit hate crimes are more susceptible to committing crimes again once they're out of jail. If they are, then they should be locked up with the key thrown away. That would be the only advantage to the hate crime statute.
User avatar
By Potemkin
#1882853
One has to wonder whether those who commit hate crimes are more susceptible to committing crimes again once they're out of jail. If they are, then they should be locked up with the key thrown away. That would be the only advantage to the hate crime statute.

This guy is clearly very dangerous. Most guys would have just slapped the tranny about a bit and then left. This guy beat him unconscious with a fire extinguisher in the heat of the moment and then, much later, finished him off when he revived. No 'crime of passion' or 'heat of the moment' here. His motivation was clearly his prejudice against transsexuals and gays; his response was disproportionate to what he perceived to be the offence against him.
User avatar
By Dave
#1882895
He committed murder, execute him. Even if it was only a tranny he killed.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1882974
This guy is clearly very dangerous. Most guys would have just slapped the tranny about a bit and then left. This guy beat him unconscious with a fire extinguisher in the heat of the moment and then, much later, finished him off when he revived. No 'crime of passion' or 'heat of the moment' here. His motivation was clearly his prejudice against transsexuals and gays; his response was disproportionate to what he perceived to be the offence against him.

Well I only skimmed the article. If that's the case then I'm at agreement with Dave: the proper course of action is a bullet to the brain.
User avatar
By Godstud
#1882993
Premeditated murderers should be executed. I agree.
This situation has nothing to do with the gender of the person murdered, only that it was murder.
By Zyx
#1883051
Article wrote:The jury heard jailhouse phone conversations, including Andrade telling a girlfriend "gay things must die." He did not testify in his own defense.


If this is true, then this was a bad man. Without this, everything else is explicable from a rational standpoint. For deceit is an evil all its own.
User avatar
By Igor Antunov
#1887596
For whatever reason he murdered beside maybe complete and utter uncontrolable schitzophrenic insanity, the punishment should be identical. Murder is murder.

If I murdered her for being gay or I murdered her for dumping my gaming pc in the river, she is still murdered because I freely chose to murder her.
User avatar
By QatzelOk
#1887606
Hate-crime legislation is silly. A crime motivated by non-prejudicial hate is no less hateful than one motivated by a prejudicial hate.

I agree.

I realize it's horrible that he killed her because she had a dick.

But what if he'd killed her because she had a tattoo or a mole? Would that mean he should walk away with a few demerit points on his driver's license?

Why set up "special categories" of crime for "special people?"

Murder is murder. The exact hateful circumstances don't change anything, and it doesn't really "send out the right message" like many minority activists seem to think it does. It just makes the majority culture wonder why your suffering gets special mention.
By Zyx
#1887857
The thing with this incident is that it is not clearly a hate crime. It's not clear whether he killed this boy for deceit or for being gay. If it were the former, it's not a hate crime.

Killing someone for a being a certain way is worse than merely killing someone for doing you wrong [or by accident.] In the example of killing someone for being themselves, it's a consequence of an ascribed characteristic that is likely out of the control of that person being ascribed: this is awful. Killing for an asserted characteristic, on the other hand, is meh. When Stalin starved those "bourgeoise" farmers he had a point.
User avatar
By QatzelOk
#1888926
Killing someone for a being a certain way is worse than merely killing someone for doing you wrong [or by accident.]

Zyx, by your rules, every war death is a hate crime. People get killed just for being some nationality or belonging to a club or political organisation.

Every dead Iraqi and Afghani (killed by Nato or the US) has been targeted because of something he is.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1888940
Uh no because war death isn't considered a crime and thus can't be affected by statutes. ;)
By Zyx
#1888950
QatzelOk, precisely. I do not see the problem with this.
User avatar
By QatzelOk
#1889147
Yes, Zyx, I'm glad you don't. But you have to explain the implications to the cheesecakes of the world.

They need to understand why war deaths are all hate crimes.

The elites need to understand this too. That intentionally killing people to maintain your own caste privilege is a hate crime against people who are outside your usual circle of acquaintances - which is very parochial and narrow-minded. This murder of other (weaker) classes is no different than the murder of other (weaker) ethnic or social minorities.

So every German killed in World Wars 1 and 2 was a hate crime.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1889241
Yes and I suppose every Jew killed was a love crime, eh?
By Falx
#1889286
For the first time I have seen both Quatz and Zyx be move rational than the people they argue against.
By Zyx
#1889687
Falx, I'll suppose that this is the first time that you read either QatzelOk or my posts.
User avatar
By MistyTiger
#1890107
He should get life in prison.

It's freaky because I'm watching a movie called Bad Education (Mala Educacion) and there's a guy named Andrade and he killed his brother, who was a transgendered male. :eek:

Not entirely untrue but global factors don't favo[…]

@KurtFF8 I am not blaming the victims. If anythi[…]

If you are not using culture as a racial delineat[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

I wonder how much is still there to dig out (and n[…]