- 09 May 2009 07:28
#1900435
"When do you ask yourself, 'Maybe everyone else isn't wrong for using the definitions of words; maybe I'm wrong for making up new definitions of words and then using them as crude slurs' -TiG
Donald-
I purposely posted the constitution in the first page of the voting thread. Just read up on it. It's all there.
It is possible, I think, to gain an MP seat with only 2 votes, but it pretty much takes 3 to attain one.
Ingliz has the formula down pat...It's slightly confusing to me, though I think I understand how it works...for the most part...It's an adaption of the same system we used before, just tuned slightly to adjust the total number of seats. It has to do with what percentage of the vote a party receives of the total number of votes.
I purposely posted the constitution in the first page of the voting thread. Just read up on it. It's all there.
It is possible, I think, to gain an MP seat with only 2 votes, but it pretty much takes 3 to attain one.
Ingliz has the formula down pat...It's slightly confusing to me, though I think I understand how it works...for the most part...It's an adaption of the same system we used before, just tuned slightly to adjust the total number of seats. It has to do with what percentage of the vote a party receives of the total number of votes.
"When do you ask yourself, 'Maybe everyone else isn't wrong for using the definitions of words; maybe I'm wrong for making up new definitions of words and then using them as crude slurs' -TiG