QatzelOk wrote:I get most of my media in French, so the perspectives are very different. Algerian media, Iranian media in French, radical student media from French universities etc.
I don't have a lot of respect for American philosophy or thought because it is mostly career-oriented, or ass-kissing-the-elites related.
Noam Chomsky did a lot of great work with linguistics... about 60 years ago. Since that time, he has come to be "The Smart American" in alternative media and on campuses. It's like he has been made out to be a giant brain living among ignorant snipers.
My father graduated in linguistics a long time ago Q. And he studied Chomsky. A lot of interesting work in linguistics.
He is an anarchist. He also lived or tried to live in a Kibbutz in Israel. He found it hard to get along with the others because he said they all tended to not be contrarian and he questioned everything.
Chomsky has an undercurrent of intense lack of confrontation of the system. I think it was about survival.
There are many great intellectuals who never made it in academia because they were ostracized and punished severely. The more reaction you get from the mainstream probably the better you are in thinking critically and the more truthful your criticism for it. People really want to believe in their myths, fantasies and lies. And woe to the person who shakes that up.
The French have an excellent tradition of independent thought in everything.
You can find really creative political thought in French media sources and also literature of all sorts.
There is a very strong lack of respect for government in many things in France. What the French respect far more are the creative parts of their culture. The ones that are always looking for something new among the most well-rooted traditions.
I really do not know much about French Canadian history either Q. I never studied Canadian history at all. Just passing knowledge about it.
I have learned some new things from you over the years. I appreciate it.
I have always identified with how my mother described herself. She was born in a small rural town in Puerto Rico and she was poor. And came from campesinos or Puerto Rican rural people. She moved to New York City when she was young. I think she was 7 years old when she got there. She lived there for 13 years. Went through a lot of struggles. But she wound up back home on the island where I was born and my older sister too.
She was an outstanding student and very politically active and involved. She was asked many times to be the leader. It never was her personal ambition to be a leader. However, everyone noticed her abilities and pressured her into leadership roles. It cost her a lot of time and sacrifice. She was extraordinarily intelligent and dedicated. But also she was down to earth and very humble. For her she was always from the Latin American working class and peasant class. And she had a very hard-won education and she was driven to learn her entire life.
Every pressure and obstacle was a really great opportunity to serve the ones at the bottom there.
She died how she lived. With integrity and got tremendous respect from many people. From all walks of life.
It is a beautiful day. I think she would have liked you Q.
You are a handsome man. No matter how old you get. But more importantly, you have an unconventional mindset.
C'est un plaisir de vous lire et aussi de vous comprendre.