QatzelOk wrote:Of course they did. They protected themselves with layers of security protection, first and foremost, the "house slaves." Most of our upper classes are house slaves, the 1% also fearing the 99%.
Christian countries (with Jewish banksters) "invented scientific racism" in the 18th Century. It was during the following centuries that it became a mark of "education and sophistication" to be a racist. The KKK were often from the upper classes of Christians.
You are confusing "immigration" with "racism."
Yes, the mass media has indoctrinated its audience with multi-culturalism and pro-immigration memes. But "race" is not the same thing. Racism is NOT naturally occurring because it is socially-constructed. It must be manufactured, just like pro-immigratoin policies need to have their consent manufactured. But please, don't mix up these two things.
One can be anti-immigration and completely non-racist, and one can be a pro-immigration racist. For the latter, imagine a minority that wants to "destroy the white race" with immigration. This would be a racist, pro-immigration stance.
***
This is not entirely true. The famine-refugees were treated almost exactly like kidnapped African slaves, right up until their "placement" as canal-diggers in North America in the mid 1800s. Sixteen hours of work per day, 6 days per week, and the right to work from the age of 8 years old. This is pretty close to plantation slavery, and their lifespans were as short as African slaves as well.
And then in the late 19th ... right up to mid-20th... the British Empire had the "British Home Children" program, which sent many orphans (lots of them were Irish origin) to the empire to slave away for masters in private homes. 10% of Canada's anglophones are from this program.
I haveno idea what you think 'scientific racism' is, but it is simply true that human beings adapt to a certain way of life over time and it alters their genetics. Any biologist worth their salt will confirm that this is a fact, and humans are not exempt from the forces of natural selection and evolution.
As a result, people just have a natural inclination for distinct behaviors, talents, and even aesthetics. And this is carried in their blood so it is very difficult, perhaps impossible, to 'wducate' them out of it.
This is not merely a scientific fact...it is also quite apparent to anyone who lives in a diverse society today, which almost white people do, which we can thank immigration policies for. If you don't notice that white people simply act differently to black people, you are either a fool or you are lying to yourself. And that difference comes from the blood, not from training. A black person adopted by white parents who attends white majority schools is still going to act like a black person...although they will show signs of some psychological distress from many years of repressing their true nature in order to 'fit in'. Stuff like that is simply part of the personal experience of every white person who has their eyes open and is brave enough to admit it to themselves.
Such a person will, in fact, because they live in a society that is an evolutionary mismatch for them, feel like something is wrong with society and seek to change it to be more 'black'. Everyone has noticed that phenomenon, also. And of course they would. Any life form would. This is just biology.
By the same process, if people have continued to survive for thousands of years after losing their homeland and dwelling within a larger different foreign nation, they necessarily must have developed contempt for that nation, or else they would have simply assimilated into it and become absorbed. Their particular genotype would be like a drop in the bucket and would be quickly washed away..and they would go extinct like the samnites in the roman empire did. If instead they continued to exist then they had to develop in their blood something that maintained their genetic purity over a long time...and it becomes natural for them.
You cannot have a deep understanding of human nature if you ignore this aspect. The most baseline aspect which humans share with all life forms on earth. And this scientific fact refutes the political philosophy of liberalism, because liberalism is incoherent once we admit that humans are not a blank slate but do actually have an intrinsic nature they are born with. You cannot simply turn black people into white people and after 200 years of trying you can see the attempt has failed. You also cannot simply turn jews into gentiles by telling them about jesus...you could only meaningfully attempt such a conversion by altering their blood (interestingly similar to the metaphor of the sacrament) and altering the way they reproduce.