@Albert
Yes because 2001 is a very long time ago. Also you're more likely to be killed by a rightist than a Muslim in the US for Christ sake. Who the hell do you think you're fooling here?
There is nothing in the Zionist project that says "get recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital". It isn't even necessary. A declaration of power does not provide that power, in fact a declaration of power is merely a formality rather than a necessity.
Yes, because obviously they killed all the Christians which is why there is an entire nation of them in Lebanon and a large minority of them in Egypt. This is why there's an entire Islamo-Christian culture in the Middle East where both Muslims and Christians co-exist /s
You do realize that the Byzantines razed down a pagan temple and built the church over it's remains. The Byzantine Empire and the Caliph are no better than each other. Furthermore mosques at the time served double purposes so both Christians, Jews, and Muslims could practice their religions there. But I still disagree with the decision. Calling the church a mosque is a sign of dominance and a clear attempt at displaying who is the dominant political entity there and I absolutely despise such messages. It's such an immature and childish act from the rulers to do so and creates a tense and unstable atmosphere for what? For what reason? For what cost? Just to basically say "Ha ha ha! I'm better than you than every way and I can take anything I want from you!" it creates rebellions and tensions for such a stupid fucking reason. There's nothing efficient or traditional about these techniques, this is just a standard case of stupid governance.
@noir
Do you think the turn of policy after 1973 oil embargo and Palestine media obsession came out of the blue?
Noir, information about Palestine and Israel's atrocities didn't just come out of the blue and you'd have to be an idiot to believe that. Israel was committing atrocities since the 1950s and the EU was made in the 1970s. Only during the 2000s did
anyone even know about Palestine which was after 9/11 when people wanted to learn about the Middle East and find out what the fuck was going on.
Of course today there is free will in EU support for the Palestine cause (which lies on historical European ancient hatred)
What even are you saying here? What "historical ancient hatred" even is there. If you're talking about the Crusades I highly doubt Arabs at the time gave a shit or cared about the Crusades or whatever. Most Muslims during that time would've never even heard of the Crusades, especially in Iran and Africa.
but historically speaking it was a policy adopted as a result of the Arab Lobby in EU with the Arab states.
And where the hell is the proof that this was the case? I swear everything that comes out of your mouth is a conspiracy theory and doesn't even have basis either in reality or hypothetically. There's literally no feasible reason for that to be the case at all. Why would the EU pass a law for a bunch of people that they know is not involved in European politics?
EU Arab lobby, PAEAC (the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation) and the native Arab lobby in Britain, CAABU (The Council for Arab-British Understanding) and LMEC (Labour Middle East Council) both founded by British Labor MP Christopher Mayhew.
Listing random organizations, some that didn't even exist when the policy was passed, that aren't even lobbies is not proof. Unless you have hard evidence you won't prove anything.