PNL, PUC/PUC-L, CA, SLD Grand Coallition - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
Forum rules: This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
User avatar
By OldMajor
#1873232
Since you subscribe to the utter sham that is neoclassical macroeconomics, that's not likely. And it's empirically wrong anyway. Out of all of us Dave is the most knowledgeable in economics (and almost anything else, really).


:roll:
User avatar
By Dr House
#1873253
Wiam, I'm not a neoliberal in case you haven't noticed. I'm a producerist and so is my party.
User avatar
By Dr House
#1873284
Dan disallowed it, so for now a minority government can't form.
User avatar
By dilpill
#1873301
Dr House wrote:Dan disallowed it, so for now a minority government can't form.

For this election, but it could still be passed during this session so that it affects the next election.

Cheesecake_Marmalade wrote:Rest assured, my party will oppose this non-democratic BS.

A minority government is better than no government, right?
Last edited by dilpill on 15 Apr 2009 22:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Gnote
#1873307
I would certainly support the allowance of minority governments.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1873316
A minority government is better than no government, right?

Not at all. Consensus should be reached at all costs. If we're going to do this little parliamentary experiment we should at least do it right. They voted us in to represent the will of the majority of people, not the will of a good portion of the population.
User avatar
By Oxymoron
#1873329
Come enough with this already lets just form the goverment, and vote for who will be PM and who will have what ministry positions.
User avatar
By Dave
#1873341
wiam wrote:You dont have enough votes to form a government.

Election results:
SLD 16
SN 15
PNL 13
PUC 13
THP 13
RF 8
CA 7
LC 7
POP 4

Total votes: 96

Votes need to form a government: 49

Votes held by SLD, PNL, PUC, and CA: 49
User avatar
By Ombrageux
#1873719
On the platform:
The basic government platform should be that of the SLD. Amendments to that platform should be made in proportion to the electoral weight of the other parties. In all likelihood on economic policy, the SLD/PNL's combined weight should lead to a fairly progressive result. On social policy, things will have to be more mixed given the conservatism of the right-wing parties and PUC (except PUC-L).

On the ministers:
The importance of the job will be proportional to that of the party's success. The Prime Minister will be issued from the SLD's ranks, probably Paradigm. The PUC and PNL will have to get roughly co-equal posts, probably the foreign and interior ministries. And so forth.
User avatar
By Ombrageux
#1873869
Economic negotiations thus far.

Pre-election discussions.

I suggest that the SLD platform should be the basis of negotiations.

We need to identify keys areas of disagreement. Each coalition member must:
* Identify parts of their own platform that are not negotiable (IE: a point so important they would willing to abandon a democratic coalition and force negotiations with Communists and Fascists to form a government). These should be within reason!
* Identify those points that non-SLD parties have substantial agreement upon, usually mandating some sort of amendment to the SLD platform.
User avatar
By peter_co
#1873965
I suggest that the SLD platform should be the basis of negotiations.

The SLD is the member of the coalition that lies farthest to the left, so I can't say that I see the wisdom of such a starting point. I would find it much more reasonable to start with the platform of the PUC-L, which appears to be closest to the middle ground.
User avatar
By Dr House
#1873990
If we start with the PUC-L platform the first thing we need to do is throw out their corporate tax rate. It's much too high.
User avatar
By Donna
#1873999
A liberal wing within a centrist party is probably not the best place to look for a negotiated platform, House.
User avatar
By Dr House
#1874039
1. I said if. I'd prefer we start with my own party's platform, for several reasons (other than it being my own).
2. the PUC-L and the PUC are the same party on economic issues. Saying PUC-L was a riposte.
User avatar
By Dr House
#1879202
C'mon people it's been almost a week since the election and we're no closer to forming a government.
User avatar
By Dr House
#1879209
duh, it's 3 in the fucking morning.

talking about religion As I should be doing. Th[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLEFm2BjyoY http[…]

The reality is that post ww2 'west' only exists t[…]

Someone's personal level of outrage doesn't give […]