- 28 Jan 2022 23:06
#15209349
It may be, but the position does require technical competency. SCOTUS justices are expected to know what they are doing and have a CV to prove it.
Why not just hire the Black woman without saying anything? Why are so called progressives so eager to disregard the merits of the people they want to support?
I live in Chicago, which elected a Black lesbian mayor 3 years ago and it turns out that was what people cared about - not her ideas (some good, some questionable) or her own prior experience (she had plenty to be a mayor on her own merit). I don't even think she's been a bad mayor, even if I don't completely align with her ideologically.
Rugoz wrote:Oh please, let's not pretend supreme court justice is a "senior position in gov't". It's a politicized as it gets and nobody even hides it.
It may be, but the position does require technical competency. SCOTUS justices are expected to know what they are doing and have a CV to prove it.
Why not just hire the Black woman without saying anything? Why are so called progressives so eager to disregard the merits of the people they want to support?
I live in Chicago, which elected a Black lesbian mayor 3 years ago and it turns out that was what people cared about - not her ideas (some good, some questionable) or her own prior experience (she had plenty to be a mayor on her own merit). I don't even think she's been a bad mayor, even if I don't completely align with her ideologically.