- 03 Feb 2024 00:33
#15303502
Your source is from 2019. Go to wiki, find the citation, click on it and it will take you to a news article from 2019 at a place called "econofact". This is quite comical mate.
All that is now outdated nonsense. Carbon taxes "reduce" emissions superficially not in reality and by penalty, by forcing people to pay money to replace their cars, which in turn causes more environmental damage as it increases consumerism and throws more cars into the streets, more steel, more batteries, more CO2, more extraction and so on and forth.
These are fake metrics with no leg to stand on.
Think about it, one says this year 1000 cars produced 1000 tonnes of CO2, next year 1000 new cars(but actually 1000+1000=2000) produced 900 tonnes of CO2 in total!
But what about the CO2 cost to produce these extra replacement 1000 cars to replace the older ones? And what about the CO2 cost to produce the money to buy them? And what about the CO2 cost to scrap them? And what about the CO2 cost to pay the "carbon taxes"?
All unaccounted for, ALWAYS, never factored in because that would give people heart-attacks, nosebleeds and severe dissociative disorders.
It's all fake. It's all about getting you in the rat race so you can be taxed and get you into the credit tit several times over and over and over.
late wrote:Nope.
"Research shows that carbon taxes effectively reduce emissions.[8] Many economists argue that carbon taxes are the most efficient (lowest cost) way to tackle climate change.[9][10][11][12][13] Seventy-seven countries and over 100 cities have committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050.[14][8] As of 2019, carbon taxes have been implemented or scheduled for implementation in 25 countries,[15] while 46 countries put some form of price on carbon, either through carbon taxes or carbon emission trading schemes.[16]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_tax#:~:text=A%20carbon%20tax%20is%20a,like%20more%20severe%20weather%20events.
Your source is from 2019. Go to wiki, find the citation, click on it and it will take you to a news article from 2019 at a place called "econofact". This is quite comical mate.
All that is now outdated nonsense. Carbon taxes "reduce" emissions superficially not in reality and by penalty, by forcing people to pay money to replace their cars, which in turn causes more environmental damage as it increases consumerism and throws more cars into the streets, more steel, more batteries, more CO2, more extraction and so on and forth.
These are fake metrics with no leg to stand on.
Think about it, one says this year 1000 cars produced 1000 tonnes of CO2, next year 1000 new cars(but actually 1000+1000=2000) produced 900 tonnes of CO2 in total!
But what about the CO2 cost to produce these extra replacement 1000 cars to replace the older ones? And what about the CO2 cost to produce the money to buy them? And what about the CO2 cost to scrap them? And what about the CO2 cost to pay the "carbon taxes"?
All unaccounted for, ALWAYS, never factored in because that would give people heart-attacks, nosebleeds and severe dissociative disorders.
It's all fake. It's all about getting you in the rat race so you can be taxed and get you into the credit tit several times over and over and over.
EN EL ED EM ON
...take your common sense with you, and leave your prejudices behind...
...take your common sense with you, and leave your prejudices behind...